RE: RSA Key Uniqueness

2004-03-23 Thread David Schwartz
> Hi Andrew, > > How unique is it? Is it statistically improbable that I could > > generate the > > same key twice? > If you have properly seeded your random generator, generated > (RSA) keys should > be quite unique. It doesn't matter. Breaking an RSA key basically involves factoring a

Re: RSA Key Uniqueness

2004-03-19 Thread Andrew Walrond
Hi Andrew It was a good job I asked the question I think. Gerrit and yourself have caused me to sit down and learn a lot more about cryptography than I had intended, but it has been very useful. On Friday 19 Mar 2004 01:01, Andrew Mann wrote: > I don't see that you should be using public

Re: RSA Key Uniqueness

2004-03-18 Thread Andrew Mann
I don't see that you should be using public key encryption here. Why don't you just make a secret key, encrypt your data, send the data and a reference along with it, and output the secret key and the reference? Public key operations are slow. If you intend to encrypt an entire file with th

Re: RSA Key Uniqueness

2004-03-18 Thread Andrew Walrond
On Thursday 18 Mar 2004 16:14, Gerrit E.G. 'Insh_Allah' Hobbelt wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > > How unique is it? Is it statistically improbable that I could generate > > the same key twice? > > If you have properly seeded your random generator, generated (RSA) keys > should be quite unique. > Here is a