Thank you very much for your quick and great replies, Pauli, Richard and Matt!!
> ./config --prefix=$HOME/local/openssl-3.0.1 no-shared no-module
With this options, it works perfectly!
Thanks again,
Shino
2022年2月22日(火) 17:46 Richard Levitte :
>
> 'no-module' will do what you want. I notice
On 22/02/2022 07:54, pa...@openssl.org wrote:
There is a define to allow this: STATIC_LEGACY but I don't remember how
to specify it on the configuration command line.
We should probably turn this on in a no-shared build.
Configure with "no-module".
Matt
Pauli
On 22/2/22 5:37 pm, Shun
'no-module' will do what you want. I noticed, though, that the
documentation in INSTALL.md isn't entirely clear on what that does.
./config --prefix=$HOME/local/openssl-3.0.1 no-shared no-module
Cheers,
Richard
On Tue, 22 Feb 2022 07:37:03 +0100,
Shunichi Shinohara wrote:
>
> Hi List,
>
>
There is a define to allow this: STATIC_LEGACY but I don't remember how
to specify it on the configuration command line.
We should probably turn this on in a no-shared build.
Pauli
On 22/2/22 5:37 pm, Shunichi Shinohara wrote:
Hi List,
I have a question about OpenSSL 3.0 and static linking.
The "unadopted" category is not the same as "unsupported". We'll make
an effort but if access to a physical machine is required, we will have
to stop. Whoever reports a problem will like have to assist with fixing
it. Be that by doing builds or writing code.
The platform policy page categor
Sorry,
I forgot to include also a link to INSTALL.md
I am linking the preview from PR#12109 again, as it has been improved
to leverage Markdown formatting to be more readable:
https://github.com/openssl/openssl/blob/be101175badd30402d2e480a79e98ade1343cbfd/INSTALL.md#installing-openssl
Same ca
Hello and welcome!
> On my system (Debian 10 - Buster) is OpenSSL installed with Version 1.1.
> Now, I want to install OpenSSL 3.x, but which is the best way for that?
>
> Deinstall the old one, or?
First, keep in mind that 3.x is still in alpha development stage, so
using it as the system-wide l
I have tested n times,but the result is same. OpenVPN renegotiate keys every a hour. Bf-cbc should be faster or fastest.but...Bernhard Froehlich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 写道: songwb wrote:> Dear friends> I use OpenSSL's speed command testing the speed of Blowfish and> AES,find bf-cbc faster than aes-
AFAIK Blowfish key setup times are very high. That
might account for the difference.
All things being equal AES certainly gives you more
security than any other cipher.
And AES was chosen also because it was found fit for
implementation on severely constrained embedded
devices. So you get both
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006, ?? wrote:
> Dear friends I use OpenSSL's speed command testing the speed of Blowfish and
> AES,find bf-cbc faster than aes-128-cbc.But when I download a large file
> from intranet of OpenVPN,find bf-cbc seems slower than aes-128-cbc,why? Can
> you give help? thanks!
>
维宾 宋 wrote:
> Dear friends
> I use OpenSSL's speed command testing the speed of Blowfish and
> AES,find bf-cbc faster than aes-128-cbc.But when I download a large
> file from intranet of OpenVPN,find bf-cbc seems slower than
> aes-128-cbc,why? Can you give help? thanks!
> ---download rate---
> aes-
Joppe Bos wrote:
Hello everyone,
I am fairly new with openssl and am trying to write a function which can
make a public / private key pair with GMP (an open source big number
library). I am doing this to compare the running time with openssl. I have
a few questions regarding the openssl genrsa c
Hello:
I'm rigth ?? if i'm right how can i know the key that is being used for
decrypt the message ??
I have my problem fixed yet thanks :)
---
Best regards
Carlos Guzmán Álvarez
Vigo-Spain
_
Localiza y ponte en contacto con tus
Hello:
The key derivation and encryption for TLS is done in ssl/t1_enc.c there's
actually some debugging code in there already so if you #define TLS_DEBUG
it
should print out all the keys for you.
I'm making more test using debugging features of openssl ( nice features ),
i'm trying to build
Hello:
The key derivation and encryption for TLS is done in ssl/t1_enc.c there's
actually some debugging code in there already so if you #define TLS_DEBUG
it
should print out all the keys for you.
Thanks very much i will try to do a build using this define :)
Best regards
Carlos Guzman Alvarez
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003, Carlos G.A. wrote:
> Hello:
>
> I'm making an implementation of the TLS 1.0 protocol in C#, for testing
> it i'm using OpenSSL under Cygwin ( openssl s_server ... ), i have a
> question about debug output, there are any way for know what are the
> keys that the server is usi
Hello:
www.rtfm.com/ssldump/
Thanks i will try it :)
--
Best regards
Carlos Guzman Alvarez
Vigo-Spain
_
Melodías, logos y mil servicios para tu teléfono en MSN Móviles.
http://www.msn.es/MSNMovil/
___
Using ssldump might help. It does a lot of decoding of the data
exchanged between a client and server.
www.rtfm.com/ssldump/
Ashu
Carlos G.A. wrote:
> Hello:
>
> I'm making an implementation of the TLS 1.0 protocol in C#, for testing
> it i'm using OpenSSL under Cygwin ( openssl s_server ... ),
18 matches
Mail list logo