On 29/05/12 22:52, Matt Caswell (fr...@baggins.org) wrote:
On 29/05/12 16:55, chip...@gmx.de wrote:
Now I set for every variable the BN_FLG_CONSTIME Flag, so that I can
be sure, that they will need the same time.
I measured the time the BN_nnmod operation in the BN_mod_add function
needs for
to do a carry or
creating a new word for the value which is bigger than the modulos.
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Tue, 29 May 2012 22:52:11 +0100
> Von: "Matt Caswell (fr...@baggins.org)"
> An: openssl-users@openssl.org
> Betreff: Re: Problems with OpenSS
On 29/05/12 16:55, chip...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi,
thank you again for your answer.
Now I set for every variable the BN_FLG_CONSTIME Flag, so that I can be sure,
that they will need the same time.
I measured the time the BN_nnmod operation in the BN_mod_add function needs for
the modulo operation a
t). When I want to use the summands value later, then it
just has the value zero.
Thank you for your help.
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Mon, 28 May 2012 23:23:43 +0100
> Von: "Matt Caswell (fr...@baggins.org)"
> An: openssl-users@openssl.org
> Betreff: Re
t from the caching of temporary variables.
Thank you for your answer.
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Tue, 15 May 2012 00:04:16 +0100
Von: "Matt Caswell (fr...@baggins.org)"
An: openssl-users@openssl.org
Betreff: Re: Problems with OpenSSl BN
On 14/05/12 15:48, chip.
time with different
context variables, but it has no consequences. The caculating results also stay
the same.
Thank you for your answer.
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Tue, 15 May 2012 00:04:16 +0100
> Von: "Matt Caswell (fr...@baggins.org)"
> An: openssl-users@o
On 14/05/12 15:48, chip...@gmx.de wrote:
Hello,
I am using the OpenSSL BN functions. Wenn I measure the time which a BN
function needs, then I see that for example BN_mod_add, needs for every calling
different times. Shouldn't it be the same timeconsumption, every time I call
for example BN_m
