* AngelWarrior wrote on Wed, May 20, 2009 at 15:18 -0500:
> "I dont need to know with whom I am contacting but after
> contact my messages should be private."
If you sent your message to just anybody, how can it be private?
oki,
Steffen
--[ End of message ]--
* Scott Gifford wrote on Wed, May 20, 2009 at 21:52 -0400:
> AngelWarrior writes:
>
> > but this still requires a CA kind of certificate right.I dont
> > know if the client will be have a CA certificate to
> > authenticate it.If I am wrong please explain me how it can be
> > done.
>
> Regular SS
AngelWarrior wrote:
> but this still requires a CA kind of certificate right.
> I dont know if the client will be have a CA certificate
> to authenticate it.If I am wrong please explain me how
> it can be done.
The usual solution (as used on secure web pages, for credit card orders, and
so on) i
AngelWarrior writes:
> but this still requires a CA kind of certificate right.I dont know if the
> client will be have a CA certificate to authenticate it.If I am wrong please
> explain me how it can be done.
Regular SSL only requires a certificate on the server. Encrypted Web
browsing with htt
AngelWarrior wrote:
> Thank you for replying.
> I am thinking of this design.Is this feasible.My design approach
> is mainly based on
> "I dont need to know with whom I am contacting but after contact
> my messages should be private."
I don't think this is a coherent approach unless you layer som
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 03:18:34PM -0500, AngelWarrior wrote:
> Thank you for replying.
> I am thinking of this design.Is this feasible.My design approach is mainly
> based on
> "I dont need to know with whom I am contacting but after contact my messages
> should be private."
For pseudonymous sec
Thank you for replying.
I am thinking of this design.Is this feasible.My design approach is mainly
based on
"I dont need to know with whom I am contacting but after contact my messages
should be private."
client(My own application)
Server (My own application)
1.(client)create a normal socket and
> AngelWarrior writes:
>
> > but this still requires a CA kind of certificate right.
> > I dont know if the client will be have a CA certificate
> > to authenticate it.If I am wrong please explain me how
> > it can be done.
>
> The server must have or know something that an attacker does not
> ha
AngelWarrior writes:
> but this still requires a CA kind of certificate right.
> I dont know if the client will be have a CA certificate
> to authenticate it.If I am wrong please explain me how
> it can be done.
The server must have or know something that an attacker does not have or
know. Othe
but this still requires a CA kind of certificate right.I dont know if the
client will be have a CA certificate to authenticate it.If I am wrong please
explain me how it can be done.
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 2:47 PM, Scott Gifford wrote:
> AngelWarrior writes:
>
> > I need some Info.I have a clien
forgot to say at step 7 and 8 agreed upon encryption algorithm
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 3:18 PM, AngelWarrior
wrote:
> Thank you for replying.
> I am thinking of this design.Is this feasible.My design approach is mainly
> based on
> "I dont need to know with whom I am contacting but after contact
AngelWarrior writes:
> I need some Info.I have a client and server application which
> requires a secure medium for the transferring of data between each
> other. Currently I am using openssl to achieve this using private
> and public key certificates with RSA encryption. I don't want to
> ship t
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 02:37:58PM -0500, AngelWarrior wrote:
> I need some Info.I have a client and server application which requires a
> secure medium for the transferring of data between each other. Currently I
> am using openssl to achieve this using private and public key certificates
> with
13 matches
Mail list logo
