Re: OCSP_basic_verify FAILED(returns -1) (all details in email)

2012-06-06 Thread Vladimir Belov
Yes! I forgot about OpenSSL initialization. Thank you, Dr. Stephen Henson. From: Dr. Stephen Henson Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2012 5:12 PM To: openssl-users@openssl.org Subject: Re

Re: OCSP_basic_verify FAILED(returns -1) (all details in email)

2012-06-06 Thread Dr. Stephen Henson
On Wed, Jun 06, 2012, Vladimir Belov wrote: > Hello. > > OCSP_basic_verify failed(returns -1) although "openssl ocsp -respin > ..." show "Response verify OK" with the same OCSP response and root > CAs. > > I attached to this email the ZIP and TAR archives with OCSP > response, the checked cert

Re: OCSP_basic_verify error

2007-04-04 Thread Marek Marcola
Hello, > I am getting the following error in calling OCSP_basic_verify(): > > error:04067084:rsa routines:RSA_EAY_PUBLIC_DECRYPT:data too large for modulus > > Could somebody advice what is going wrong? In RSA you can encrypt/decrypt only as much data as RSA key size (size of RSA key is the size

Re: OCSP_basic_verify()

2005-10-25 Thread Steffen Fiksdal
On Tue, Oct 25, 2005, Steffen Fiksdal wrote: Hi! What return code(s) from OCSP_basic_verify() signals that the verification process went ok, regardless of any flags set ? Anything >0 though at present it will only return 1 for success. I see in the function that if ocsp_check_issuer() re

Re: OCSP_basic_verify()

2005-10-25 Thread Dr. Stephen Henson
On Tue, Oct 25, 2005, Steffen Fiksdal wrote: > Hi! > > What return code(s) from OCSP_basic_verify() signals that the > verification process went ok, regardless of any flags set ? > Anything >0 though at present it will only return 1 for success. Steve. -- Dr Stephen N. Henson. Email, S/MIME a

RE: OCSP_basic_verify

2001-12-12 Thread Neff Robert A
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: OCSP_basic_verify Tat Sing Kong wrote: > > (sobbing) I have been looking for the documentation, but there is none. All > I can see i the definition of > some flags: > > #define OCSP_NOCERTS0x1 > #define OCSP_NOINTERN

Re: OCSP_basic_verify

2001-12-12 Thread Dr S N Henson
Tat Sing Kong wrote: > > (sobbing) I have been looking for the documentation, but there is none. All > I can see i the definition of > some flags: > > #define OCSP_NOCERTS0x1 > #define OCSP_NOINTERN 0x2 > #define OCSP_NOSIGS 0x4 > #defin

RE: OCSP_basic_verify

2001-12-12 Thread Tat Sing Kong
0x400 #define OCSP_NOTIME 0x800 What are they? Tat. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dr S N Henson > Sent: 11 December 2001 18:21 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: OCSP_basic_ver