Michael Sierchio wrote:
>
> Ulf Moeller wrote:
>
> > Also, if you're in doubt about what the GPL does or doesn't allow, you
> > should get legal advise. The FSF clearly has its own ideological agenda.
>
> The GPL neither permits nor forbids anything -- it is an untested
> experiment, an abuse
Ulf Moeller wrote:
> Also, if you're in doubt about what the GPL does or doesn't allow, you
> should get legal advise. The FSF clearly has its own ideological agenda.
The GPL neither permits nor forbids anything -- it is an untested
experiment, an abuse of copyright law, and would not withstan
Ulf Moeller schrieb:
>
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2000, Ulf Moeller wrote:
>
> > OpenSSL is part of all major free operating systems and one or two commercial
> > ones. You can use it on those systems, thanks to a special clause in the
> > GPL. If you want to use it on any other systems, you'll have to c
On Tue, Nov 14, 2000, Ulf Moeller wrote:
> OpenSSL is part of all major free operating systems and one or two commercial
> ones. You can use it on those systems, thanks to a special clause in the
> GPL. If you want to use it on any other systems, you'll have to change your
> license. Sorry.
I f
On Monday 13 November 2000 23:54, Ulf Moeller wrote:
> > other people must be in this situation too, probably unknowingly. We
> > have to resolve this, and if what we are doing is not allowed, it should
> > probably be documented in the OpenSSL documentation.
>
> As far as the OpenSSL team is co
On Mon, Nov 13, 2000, George Staikos wrote:
> other people must be in this situation too, probably unknowingly. We have to
> resolve this, and if what we are doing is not allowed, it should probably be
> documented in the OpenSSL documentation.
As far as the OpenSSL team is concerned, everybo
George Staikos wrote:
> I see you cc:'d to me, but not to Ulf. Those were his words, not mine. No
> problem though. Calling it obnoxious is not slandering. It's an opinion and
> definitely a criticism. However, this is not the issue here so we can put
> that to rest.
I did a "Reply to all
[I am not speaking for the KDE team as a whole, but for myself as author of
the C++ SSL wrapper and utility classes for KDE 2.0]
On Monday 13 November 2000 20:22, Michael T. Babcock wrote:
> Ulf Moeller wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 13, 2000, George Staikos wrote:
> > > (I have emails here if you ne
Ulf Moeller wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2000, George Staikos wrote:
>
> > (I have emails here if you need to see these) Anyhow, is there
> > any chance of OpenSSL being released under GPL, or failing that, under a BSD
> > style licence without the advertising clause?
>
> The original authors now
On Monday 13 November 2000 18:35, Ulf Moeller wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2000, George Staikos wrote:
> > (I have emails here if you need to see these) Anyhow, is there
> > any chance of OpenSSL being released under GPL, or failing that, under a
> > BSD style licence without the advertising clause
On Mon, Nov 13, 2000, George Staikos wrote:
> (I have emails here if you need to see these) Anyhow, is there
> any chance of OpenSSL being released under GPL, or failing that, under a BSD
> style licence without the advertising clause?
The original authors now work for a company that sells
11 matches
Mail list logo
