> Hello Anders,
Hi, Servie.
> I am just puzzled if doing rpm -Uvh *.rpm is not
> allowed at all by FC3? AFAIK, with Red Hat distros
> 7.3, 8.0 or 9.0 I could install all the rpm all
> together. Not very sure, if this is a new security
> feature by FC3?
Not very sure myself. I have'nt tried
Hello Anders,
Thanks for the help and info. You have helped me solve
my problem.
--- Ringaby Anders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Servie.
>
> Have you checked that the directory, where gcc is
> located,
> is in your PATH environment variable?
>
> You can check by doing either of this:
>
Hi Mr. Ringaby,
Thank you for the reply.
--- Ringaby Anders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Servie.
>
> Have you checked that the directory, where gcc is
> located,
> is in your PATH environment variable?
>
> You can check by doing either of this:
>
> echo $PATH
> or:
> type gcc
>
> In or
Hello Servie.
Have you checked that the directory, where gcc is located,
is in your PATH environment variable?
You can check by doing either of this:
echo $PATH
or:
type gcc
In order to add the directory where gcc is located, before
running make, do this:
PATH=$PATH:
export PATH
Then run ma
On Fri, 19 Apr 2002, root wrote:
> I'm getting error 127 during the make install of openssl-0.9.6c.
>
> make: /usr/local/bin/perl: Command not found
> make: *** [intall_docs] Error 127
>
> Is this because perl is not located in /user/local/bin/perl ?
Great! you won! ;)
> I found perl in /sbin/
On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 12:52:20AM -0600, root wrote:
> I'm getting error 127 during the make install of openssl-0.9.6c.
>
> make: /usr/local/bin/perl: Command not found
> make: *** [intall_docs] Error 127
>
>
> Is this because perl is not located in /user/local/bin/perl ?
>
> I found perl
The most simple solution(?) would probably be to create a symbolic link to perl in
/usr/local/bin/perl like this:
ln -s /sbin/perl /usr/local/bin/perl
and then try to compile again.
/Tobbe
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/19/02 08:52AM >>>
I'm getting error 127 during the make install of openssl-0.9.