> On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 06:10:36 +0100, Robin Seggelmann
> said:
RS> To avoid getting into trouble with already fixed bugs you should apply
RS> the patches I sent to the dev list. I'll set up a website with a patch
RS> collection and some instructions soon.
You've certainly posted a lot!
> On Mon, 26 Jan 2009 18:19:02 +0100, Daniel Mentz said:
DM> I have some comments regarding your wiki article. But first of all
DM> thanks for taking the time writing down all this information:
Your welcome, and I'm sorry for taking so long to reply to your note...
I was both sick for a week
On Jan 26, 2009, at 5:24 PM, Daniel Mentz wrote:
I'm surprised that you can use accept() on UDP sockets. I checked
the man pages of a Debian GNU/Linux system. They say that you can
use accept() only with connection-based socket types (SOCK_STREAM,
SOCK_SEQPACKET). Is this something specifi
Wes Hardaker wrote:
http://www.net-snmp.org/wiki/index.php/DTLS_Implementation_Notes
Hi Wes,
I have some comments regarding your wiki article. But first of all
thanks for taking the time writing down all this information:
I'm trying to implement IPFIX on top of DTLS so I also made some
ex
Robin Seggelmann wrote:
As a workaround you can use connected UDP sockets. Just use accept() and
connect() as you would with TCP connections and create new BIO and SSL
objects for every connection. I have tested that and it works pretty
well so far.
Hi Robin,
I'm surprised that you can use a
On Sat, 2009-01-24 at 23:03 +0100, Georges Le grand wrote:
> So it is alike SSL VPN with data encapsulated into HTTP Packets, but I
> don't get how does HTTP run over UDP.
Probably best explained by the code... it just uses HTTP for the initial
setup -- a CONNECT request with an HTTP cookie for au
Dear David,
Thanks for the reply.
So it is alike SSL VPN with data encapsulated into HTTP Packets, but I don't
get how does HTTP run over UDP.
Kind regards
GLG
2009/1/24 David Woodhouse
> On Sat, 2009-01-24 at 00:13 +0100, Georges Le grand wrote:
> > I wonder if you could give out a reference
On Sat, 2009-01-24 at 00:13 +0100, Georges Le grand wrote:
> I wonder if you could give out a reference on how to establish a VPN
> using DTLS or to tell how to do so.
We are just using Cisco's "AnyConnect" VPN, which runs over an HTTPS
'CONNECT' and will use DTLS for subsequent data transfer if i
Hello David,
I wonder if you could give out a reference on how to establish a VPN using
DTLS or to tell how to do so.
Kind regards,
GLG
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 7:47 AM, David Woodhouse
wrote:
On Thu, 2009-01-22 at 06:10 +0100, Robin Seggelmann wrote:
>
> To avoid getting into trouble with alr
> On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 06:10:36 +0100, Robin Seggelmann
> said:
RS> As a workaround you can use connected UDP sockets. Just use accept()
RS> and connect() as you would with TCP connections and create new BIO and
RS> SSL objects for every connection. I have tested that and it works
RS> pre
On Jan 22, 2009, at 5:11 PM, Wes Hardaker wrote:
RS> As a workaround you can use connected UDP sockets. Just use
accept()
RS> and connect() as you would with TCP connections and create new
BIO and
RS> SSL objects for every connection. I have tested that and it works
RS> pretty well so far.
> On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 06:10:36 +0100, Robin Seggelmann
> said:
RS> As a workaround you can use connected UDP sockets. Just use accept()
RS> and connect() as you would with TCP connections and create new BIO and
RS> SSL objects for every connection. I have tested that and it works
RS> pre
On Jan 22, 2009, at 7:47 AM, David Woodhouse wrote:
Is there anyone who actually cares about DTLS and getting patches
applied?
Very good question. I hope someone will apply at least the bugfixes
soon. I have several patches adding new features in the pipe, but they
understandably rely on
On Thu, 2009-01-22 at 06:10 +0100, Robin Seggelmann wrote:
>
> To avoid getting into trouble with already fixed bugs you should apply
> the patches I sent to the dev list. I'll set up a website with a patch
> collection and some instructions soon.
Is there anyone who actually cares about DTLS
Hi Wes,
The biggest issue comes from needing to deal with multiple clients
trying to talk through the same UDP port, which isn't handled by at
least the 0.9.8i code at least.
Using multiple connections with one socket is still not implemented as
the OpenSSL architecture and API does not supp
15 matches
Mail list logo
