Re: Correct nonblocking use

2000-11-10 Thread Eric Rescorla
Sorry if people get this twice. I've been having mailer problems. "Scott Goodwin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Eric, > > I get a file not found from your link below. I track hacking on the URL and > no luck. Doh! I just finished experiencing multiple single points of failure. My ISP changed ove

Re: Correct nonblocking use

2000-11-10 Thread Eric Rescorla
"Scott Goodwin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Eric, > > I get a file not found from your link below. I track hacking on the URL and > no luck. Doh! My web site is hosted by my ISP and they seem to have temporarily hosed the virtual servers. I'd try again in a couple of days. Sorry about the incon

Re: Correct nonblocking use

2000-11-10 Thread Eric Rescorla
James Gaskell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > EKR > |I believe s_client/s_server handle this case correctly. There's > |also some somewhat more minimal sample code on my web site at > |http://www.rtfm.com/sslbook/examples > |The relevant file is 'sclient.c'. > I'd be interested to see that exampl

Re: Correct nonblocking use

2000-11-04 Thread Eric Rescorla
Bill Klein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Just as a follow-up to my own post. Here's some of the strange > behaviour I'm seeing: > > - I call SSL_read() which returns -1 > > - I call SSL_get_error() which returns SSL_ERROR_WANT_READ > > - I call select() to wait for readability with a timeout

Re: Correct nonblocking use

2000-11-04 Thread Bill Klein
Just as a follow-up to my own post. Here's some of the strange behaviour I'm seeing: - I call SSL_read() which returns -1 - I call SSL_get_error() which returns SSL_ERROR_WANT_READ - I call select() to wait for readability with a timeout of 30 seconds. It returns quickly indicating readab