> From: owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org On Behalf Of Jakob Bohm
> Sent: Monday, 25 February, 2013 03:07
> On 2/25/2013 4:26 AM, Dave Thompson wrote:
> The attack is against the specific timing differences that occur when
> directly implementing the RFC suggested countermeasure against the
> much
On 2/25/2013 4:26 AM, Dave Thompson wrote:
From: owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org On Behalf Of Jakob Bohm
Sent: Friday, 22 February, 2013 05:06
On 2/21/2013 11:12 AM, Mozes, Rachel wrote:
[other reports say issue]
affects just "The TLS protocol *_1.1 and 1.2_ *and the DTLS
protocol 1.0
and
> From: owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org On Behalf Of Jakob Bohm
> Sent: Friday, 22 February, 2013 05:06
> On 2/21/2013 11:12 AM, Mozes, Rachel wrote:
[other reports say issue]
> > affects just "The TLS protocol *_1.1 and 1.2_ *and the DTLS
> protocol 1.0
> > and 1.2", but in the OpenSSL announce
On 2/21/2013 11:12 AM, Mozes, Rachel wrote:
Hi all,
Recently, OpenSSL Security Advisory sent a message about a new
vulnerability which was found and numbered as CVE-2013-0169. This
announce advises to all SSL and TLS users to upgrade the OpenSSL version.
But from a quick Google search, it loo
