On Wed, Apr 22, 2020, 2:56 PM Michael Richardson wrote:
>
> Michael Mueller wrote:
> >> Michael Mueller wrote:
> >> > We've implemented what I gather can be called a CMS on Linux and
> >> Windows
> >> > using openssl evp functions.
> >>
> >> I'm not sure why you say it t
Michael Mueller wrote:
>> Michael Mueller wrote:
>> > We've implemented what I gather can be called a CMS on Linux and
>> Windows
>> > using openssl evp functions.
>>
>> I'm not sure why you say it this way.
>> OpenSSL includes CMS (RFC3369) support, but I think not u
On Tue, Apr 21, 2020, 9:46 PM Michael Richardson wrote:
>
> Michael Mueller wrote:
> > We've implemented what I gather can be called a CMS on Linux and
> Windows
> > using openssl evp functions.
>
> I'm not sure why you say it this way.
> OpenSSL includes CMS (RFC3369) support, but I thi
A few corrections:
OpenSSL included CMS (RFC3369) support since 1.0.0 (see the CHANGES
file), though for a long time, there was an arbitrary disconnect between
functions named CMS and functions named PKCS#7 even though it should
have been a continuum.
The PKCS#7 and CMS standards equally and
Michael Mueller wrote:
> We've implemented what I gather can be called a CMS on Linux and Windows
> using openssl evp functions.
I'm not sure why you say it this way.
OpenSSL includes CMS (RFC3369) support, but I think not until 1.1.0.
Did you implement RFC3369, or something else?
You d
