On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 5:32 PM, Bill Durant wrote:
That may not be sufficient, can ldfips be modified(?), it's certainly
needed to link
static to the fips canister. I'd put your energies into building a dylib
which would
give you a smidge more flexibility.
fipsld can be modified, as it is
On 10/13/2010 7:22 PM, Bill Durant wrote:
>
> On Oct 13, 2010, at 5:19 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
>> On 10/13/2010 3:31 PM, Bill Durant wrote:
>>>
>>> I am interested in building the static version of the FIPS-capable OpenSSL
>>> as an universal
>>> binary.
>>
>> Three builds, per spec, of th
On 10/13/2010 3:31 PM, Bill Durant wrote:
>
> I am interested in building the static version of the FIPS-capable OpenSSL as
> an universal
> binary.
Three builds, per spec, of the FIPS canister. No tweaks, no exceptions to
the security policy.
Then it's possible but non-trivial to integrate th
On Oct 13, 2010, at 5:27 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 10/13/2010 7:22 PM, Bill Durant wrote:
On Oct 13, 2010, at 5:19 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 10/13/2010 3:31 PM, Bill Durant wrote:
I am interested in building the static version of the FIPS-
capable OpenSSL as an universal
bi
On Oct 13, 2010, at 5:19 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 10/13/2010 3:31 PM, Bill Durant wrote:
I am interested in building the static version of the FIPS-capable
OpenSSL as an universal
binary.
Three builds, per spec, of the FIPS canister. No tweaks, no
exceptions to
the security p
