Re: [openssl-users] Re: Blowfish output using openssl is too long

2009-03-20 Thread Andrey Boyko
Try -nopad option Erwann ABALEA wrote: Hi, Hodie XIII Kal. Apr. MMIX, carlyo...@keycomm.co.uk scripsit: I would suspect that an 8 byte IV has been appended/prefixed Carl On Thu 19/03/09 9:16 PM , Dick Hollenbeck d...@softplc.com sent: I am using on Ubuntu Hardy:

RE: [openssl-users] Re: Blowfish output using openssl is too long

2009-03-20 Thread Young, Alistair
-Original Message- From: owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org [mailto:owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org] On Behalf Of Erwann ABALEA Sent: 20 March 2009 10:58 To: openssl-users@openssl.org Subject: Re: [openssl-users] Re: Blowfish output using openssl is too long > Hi, > > Hodie XIII

Re: [openssl-users] Re: Blowfish output using openssl is too long

2009-03-20 Thread Erwann ABALEA
Hi, Hodie XIII Kal. Apr. MMIX, carlyo...@keycomm.co.uk scripsit: >I would suspect that an 8 byte IV has been appended/prefixed > >Carl > >On Thu 19/03/09 9:16 PM , Dick Hollenbeck d...@softplc.com sent: > > I am using on Ubuntu Hardy: > > $ openssl enc -bf-cbc -K 01222122

Re: Blowfish output using openssl is too long

2009-03-20 Thread carlyoung
BODY { font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12px; } I would suspect that an 8 byte IV has been appended/prefixed Carl On Thu 19/03/09 9:16 PM , Dick Hollenbeck d...@softplc.com sent: I am using on Ubuntu Hardy: $ openssl enc -bf-cbc -K 012221222F2D9E459E41