Re: 0.9.7.b test failure on w2k using DLL's

2003-07-22 Thread Edgar Villanueva
openssl-0.9.7-stable-SNAP-20030722 snapshot successfully passes the tests. Is it generally safe to use the stable snapshots? I ask since I am not sure they are as well tested as a release? Thanks Dr. Stephen Henson wrote: On Tue, Jul 22, 2003, Edgar Villanueva wrote: The test below fails o

Re: 0.9.7.b test failure on w2k using DLL's

2003-07-22 Thread Dr. Stephen Henson
On Tue, Jul 22, 2003, Edgar Villanueva wrote: > openssl-0.9.7-stable-SNAP-20030722 snapshot successfully passes the tests. > > Is it generally safe to use the stable snapshots? I ask since I am not > sure they are as well tested as a release? > Well stable snapshots normally only include bugfi

Re: 0.9.7.b test failure on w2k using DLL's

2003-07-22 Thread Edgar Villanueva
openssl-0.9.7-stable-SNAP-20030722 snapshot successfully passes the tests. Is it generally safe to use the stable snapshots? I ask since I am not sure they are as well tested as a release? Thanks Dr. Stephen Henson wrote: On Tue, Jul 22, 2003, Edgar Villanueva wrote: The test below fails o

Re: 0.9.7.b test failure on w2k using DLL's

2003-07-22 Thread Dr. Stephen Henson
On Tue, Jul 22, 2003, Edgar Villanueva wrote: > The test below fails on W2k using dlls. Always in the same place with > the following message from the os. > The instruction at "0x0028b7cc" refereced memory at "0x911a0e50". The > memory could not be "read". > > The test is successful when using