Re: [openssl-users] Testing OpenSSL based solution

2015-05-13 Thread Dave Thompson
> From: openssl-users On Behalf Of Marcus Vinicius do Nascimento > Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2015 16:50 > I did some quick research and found this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Signature_Algorithm > If my understanding is correct, the public key is (p, q, g, y). You might want to look at the

Re: [openssl-users] Testing OpenSSL based solution

2015-05-12 Thread Nico Williams
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 06:10:39PM +, Salz, Rich wrote: > You can't easily have test vectors for DSA signatures since they > include a random. Any test vector would have to include the random, > and any API would have to be able to accept the random as part of the > "sign" API. Verification s

Re: [openssl-users] Testing OpenSSL based solution

2015-05-12 Thread Salz, Rich
> What Mr. Salz refers to by "Verification should be okay" is probably this: Yes and Mr. Salz greatly appreciates Mr. Bohm's elaboration. :) Lest the humor be misunderstood: yes, you're right, thanks for explaining. ___ openssl-users mailing list To u

Re: [openssl-users] Testing OpenSSL based solution

2015-05-12 Thread Jakob Bohm
On 12/05/2015 20:10, Salz, Rich wrote: You can't easily have test vectors for DSA signatures since they include a random. Any test vector would have to include the random, and any API would have to be able to accept the random as part of the "sign" API. Verification should be okay. What M

Re: [openssl-users] Testing OpenSSL based solution

2015-05-12 Thread Salz, Rich
You can't easily have test vectors for DSA signatures since they include a random. Any test vector would have to include the random, and any API would have to be able to accept the random as part of the "sign" API. Verification should be okay. ___ o