Re: [openssl-users] Polling fd before SSL_read() and renegotiations

2018-06-05 Thread Tomas Mraz
On Mon, 2018-06-04 at 18:51 +0200, Stefan via openssl-users wrote: > Hi everybody! > > I am working on a program where each peer may write at any time, so > the other side has to be able to read incoming data when it gets > available. If the peer sent nothing my program must be able to call > SSL_

Re: [openssl-users] Polling fd before SSL_read() and renegotiations

2018-06-04 Thread Stefan via openssl-users
The connection is open for verly long time (>24h), so I thought that the peer may force a renogatioation due to the session timeout. Or have I got something wrong and a renogatioation is not necessary for long-running sessions? -- openssl-users mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/

Re: [openssl-users] Polling fd before SSL_read() and renegotiations

2018-06-04 Thread Salz, Rich via openssl-users
>The code above does what I want - except for renegotiations! Do you absolutely, positively, HAVE TO support renegotiation? -- openssl-users mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users