Re: [openssl-users] Building 1.0.2g with

2016-04-01 Thread Peter Hilton
Jakob Bohm writes: > > In 1.0.2 and later, most of the files in ${BUILD_DIR}/include/openssl > are supposed to be copies/symlinks to file of the same name elsewhere > in the OpenSSL source, for instance the ones you mentions should be > links to files in subdirectories under ${BUILD_DIR}/crypt.

Re: [openssl-users] Building 1.0.2g with "no-idea"

2016-03-28 Thread Jakob Bohm
- From: openssl-users [mailto:openssl-users-boun...@openssl.org] On Behalf Of Matt Caswell Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2016 9:19 AM To: openssl-users@openssl.org Subject: Re: [openssl-users] Building 1.0.2g with "no-idea" On 23/03/16 15:09, Jason Schultz wrote: I am re-posting thi

Re: [openssl-users] Building 1.0.2g with "no-idea"

2016-03-23 Thread Floodeenjr, Thomas
well Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2016 9:19 AM To: openssl-users@openssl.org Subject: Re: [openssl-users] Building 1.0.2g with "no-idea" On 23/03/16 15:09, Jason Schultz wrote: > I am re-posting this (and another) message to the list as I was having email > issues with the list an

Re: [openssl-users] Building 1.0.2g with "no-idea"

2016-03-23 Thread Matt Caswell
On 23/03/16 15:09, Jason Schultz wrote: > I am re-posting this (and another) message to the list as I was having email > issues with the list and I posted an erroneous subject line, which may have > deterred responses. > > I have another question that was encountered at the same time as my pre