Steve Marquess wrote on 11/07/2013
09:02:05 AM:
> > Is there a basis for asserting FIPS 140 validation with
> > openssl-0.9.8e-26.el5_9.1|(none), or must the original RPM be used?
>
> You'll need to ask Red Hat; it's their proprietary validation. From a
> quick glance it appears to be a knock-of
On 11/07/2013 08:39 AM, Robert W Weaver wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> Apologies if this has been covered before, but I couldn't find it in a
> search.
>
> I'm trying to deploy FIPS 140 validated crypto to a RHEL 5 box as part
> of a FISMA covered project.
>
> I think the relevant policy is
> htt
Greetings,
Apologies if this has been covered before, but I couldn't find it in a
search.
I'm trying to deploy FIPS 140 validated crypto to a RHEL 5 box as part of
a FISMA covered project.
I think the relevant policy is
http://csrc.nist.gov/groups/STM/cmvp/documents/140-1/140sp/140sp1320
