RE: TLS unknown_ca alert number 48

2010-12-02 Thread jason.ting
> According to that, your client cert isn't self-signed. > It is apparently signed by the same company, which isn't > the same thing; in X.509 and SSL, self-signed means that > the cert Subject and Issuer,and specifically the subject > KEY and the issuing/signing KEY, are EXACTLY the same. > W

RE: TLS unknown_ca alert number 48

2010-12-01 Thread Dave Thompson
> From: owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org On Behalf Of jason.ting > Sent: Monday, 29 November, 2010 02:15 > >[server rejects client cert]. Look at the server CertReq to see > >if it is asking for particular CA(s) and if so whether the cert > >your client is using is issued by that CA (or one of th

RE: TLS unknown_ca alert number 48

2010-11-29 Thread jason.ting
>The server doesn't think so. Look at the server CertReq to see >if it is asking for particular CA(s) and if so whether the cert >your client is using is issued by that CA (or one of them). >Also check whether it is directly under or chained; >if the latter I don't think commandline s_client can

RE: TLS unknown_ca alert number 48

2010-11-28 Thread Dave Thompson
> From: owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org On Behalf Of jason.ting > Sent: Thursday, 25 November, 2010 04:16 > ... I am a client and the SSL server is being managed > by a 3rd party. When i try ... > openssl s_client -connect i5.paywide.nps.comm.com:9001 -CAfile > verisignVB.pem -cert L2009080526.crt