_
From: Ramaiah, Ravichandran Bagalur
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2022 12:55 PM
To: Matt Caswell ; openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: SSL error (78c0100): malloc failure while
implementing tls 1.3
Hi Matt,
Below is the error I got
; openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: SSL error (78c0100): malloc failure while implementing
tls 1.3
On 16/06/2022 05:52, Ramaiah, Ravichandran Bagalur wrote:
>
> *SSL error (78c0100): malloc failure
Do you get anything in the OpenSSL error stack for this (e.g. try
"ERR_prin
On 16/06/2022 05:52, Ramaiah, Ravichandran Bagalur wrote:
*SSL error (78c0100): malloc failure
Do you get anything in the OpenSSL error stack for this (e.g. try
"ERR_print_errors_fp(stdout);").
We need a bit more to go on to figure out where specifically the malloc
failure is occurring.
Hi All,
Could anyone tell me if this issue is caused due to application error or an
openssl bug?
This malloc failure is happening when I try to establish TLS connection between
2 SIP applications.
Regards,
Ravi
From: Ramaiah, Ravichandran Bagalur
Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2022 10:23 AM
To: ope
On 31-07-2013 11:16, Rajeev Tomar wrote:
Hi
>
We are using openssl 0.9.8 in our application.
Things are working fine and suddenly we are having .
Linux awtah.dispatchserver1 3.6.11-1.fc16.i686 #1 SMP Mon Dec 17
21:36:23 UTC 2012 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
error:1408F119:SSL routines:SSL3_GET_RECOR
Hello,
$ echo "obase=16;336151528" | bc
140943E8
$ openssl errstr 140943E8
error:140943E8:SSL routines:SSL3_READ_BYTES:reason(1000)
Best regards,
--
Marek Marcola
owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org wrote on 03/27/2012 01:09:56 AM:
> Blake Mizerany
> Sent by: owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org
>
>
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:15:04AM +0200, Aarno Syv?nen wrote:
> HI,
>
> what would error OpenSSL: error:0906D06C:PEM routines:PEM_read_bio:no start
> line mean ?
A PEM file was expected, but the input was not a PEM file, specifically,
it had no "-BEGIN ...-" line.
--
Viktor.
Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
> > > openssl s_client -connect xxx.org:443
> > > and it should say if secure renegotiation is supported in
> > > the output.
> > Thanks for the tip! I tried, but I am afraid I cannot tell
> > whether it is the case or not, based on this output. I tried
> > on googl
On Wed, Apr 07, 2010, Florent Georges wrote:
> Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
>
> Thanks for your fast response!
>
> > That looks like it is only part of the actual error code.
>
> That's all I have. I guess either Subversion or Neon truncates
> the error message.
>
> > I suspect it is because
Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
Thanks for your fast response!
> That looks like it is only part of the actual error code.
That's all I have. I guess either Subversion or Neon truncates
the error message.
> I suspect it is because the server doesn't support secure
> renegotiation. You can check
On Wed, Apr 07, 2010, Florent Georges wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am using openssl from within neon, itself used from within
> Subversion. During an svnsync, I receive the following error
> message:
>
> svnsync: PROPFIND of '/svn/xxx': SSL negotiation failed: SSL
> error: parse tlsext (https
Hi,
This may or may not be helpful ... it depends on your code, and what
applications that you are talking to that lead to these errors:
(1) reminds me of a problem that can occur when using OpenSSL against
some Java implementations. You can test it by using openssl s_client or
s_server using th
> My application calls some library functions, which uses
> OpenSSL. When my appliction runs, I believe OpenSSL emitted
> some messages described below.
Nope. Your application emitted them. OpenSSL detected them and reported
them, you chose to print them out.
> Does anyone know what caused thos
Try this..
./openssl s_client -tls1 -connect www.cia.gov:443
On 10/24/07, Lutz Jaenicke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Isolating the problem is more or less simple:
> openssl s_client -connect www.cia.gov:443
> shows the intermittent failures as well, so we can rule out all
> applications (cur
On Tue, 2007-10-23 at 22:02 -0700, Alex Lam wrote:
> That's TLSv1, not SSLv2.
>
> : 01 03 01 00 63 00 00 00 10 00 00 39 00 00 38 00 c..9..8.
> 0010: 00 35 00 00 88 00 00 87 00 00 84 00 00 16 00
> 00 .5..
> 0020: 13 00 00 0a 07 00 c0 00 00 33 00 00 32 00 00 2f .3..2
Isolating the problem is more or less simple:
openssl s_client -connect www.cia.gov:443
shows the intermittent failures as well, so we can rule out all
applications (curl, wget, ...). Has to be some basic thing.
I tend to observe the failure with s_client not on the first attempt but
on the nth
That's TLSv1, not SSLv2.
: 01 03 01 00 63 00 00 00 10 00 00 39 00 00 38 00 c..9..8.
0010: 00 35 00 00 88 00 00 87 00 00 84 00 00 16 00 00 .5..
0020: 13 00 00 0a 07 00 c0 00 00 33 00 00 32 00 00 2f .3..2../
0030: 00 00 45 00 00 44 00 00 41 00 00 07 05 00 80 03 ..E..D
Marek Marcola wrote:
> I think that this is CIA webserver problem.
> You may test this with:
> $ openssl s_client -connect www.cia.gov:443 -state -debug -msg [[-ssl3]
> [-tls1]]
> and in any combination after some successful connection you will get failed
> connections.
> For example:
> $ opens
Hello,
> We use curl to retrieve webpages, and recently started receiving an
> intermittent (40-60% of the time) error when retrieving a page from the
> CIA. About two weeks ago, they switched to running https only, with the
> http URLs being forwarded to the https equivalents.
>
> The error we re
Hello,
> I am trying to verify a certificate with the folowing command line on a
> windows 32 bit plateform:
>
> C:\OpenSSL\bin> openssl verify -CAfile d:\cert.pem d:\cert2.pem
>
> It replies me:
>
> d:\cert2.pem: /C=FR/ST=Cote d Or/L=Saint Apollinaire/O=societe des AUTOROUTES
> PARIS RHIN RHO
2007/4/10, Johans Taboada <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi list, I ask for help please.
Still waiting...
DatabaseError: SSL error: cipher or hash unavailable\n
...
OperationalError: SSL error: cipher or hash unavailable\n
...
What does it really mean '''cipher or hash unavailable'''? (SSL Error
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006, Carlo Agopian wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Has anybody seen the following runtime error message before?
>
> error::lib(0):func(0):reason(0)
>
Yes. It normally means "no error has been placed on the queue and the the
application wrongly thinks it has and can print it
You can't reuse a socket for a TCP connection, but you certainly can reuse the same TCP socket for an arbitrary number of SSL connections as long as you don't compromise the TCP connection while you're doing it. I suspect that is the intention here and from the sounds of things (if all he is getti
sorry if I misunderstood you, but AFAIK, pure sockets API doesnt allow socket reuse as such. You have to have a new socket for every TCP connection, you can't "reuse" a socket.
From: "Carlo Agopian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Reply-To: openssl-users@openssl.orgTo: CC: "Carlo Agopian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>S
This error is indicative that there is no error. You have simply read the error buffer one more time than you should have. There is absolutely nothing wrong with your application state if you see this reported. In my experience it wont cause any application problems if you check the error queue
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005, Yuriy Synov wrote:
> In fact I'm not using OpenSSL library directly. I use an open source library
> Indy which in turn makes use of OpenSSL. I discovered that POP3 servers that
> use DES-CBC3-SHA work correctly with my program, and the server that fails
> uses RC4-SHA. I got
eters, but
it means that I will need to modify Indy (the lib I'm using) which is not a
very simple task. I will report to this list if I get any positive results.
- Original Message -
From: "mclellan, dave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, January 23, 2005 3:12
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005, Yuriy Synov wrote:
> > See if you can connect to the server using the s_client test program. For
> > example:
> >
> > openssl s_client -conntect hostname:995
> >
> > (use whatever port it uses for POP4+SSL, 995 is standard).
>
> Output from 'openssl s_client' follows:
>
> [
lf signed certificate in certificate chain)
---
+OK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (mtiwpxc03) Maillennium POP3/PROXY
server
#2
and after that I can enter POP3 commands.
- Original Message -
From: "Dr. Stephen Henson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, January 22, 2005 2:19
ftware Engineer
EMC Corporation
228 South St.
Hopkinton MA 01748
phone: 508-249-1257
fax 508-497-8030
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Henry Su
Sent: Friday, January 21, 2005 3:11 PM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: RE: SSL error:
On Sat, Jan 22, 2005, Yuriy Synov wrote:
> > No sure if you have set it or not. If not, you can try following example:
> >
> > #define CIPHER_LIST "ALL:!ADH:!LOW:!EXP:!MD5:@STRENGTH"
> >
> > SSL_CTX_set_cipher_list(ctx, CIPHER_LIST) ;
>
> I tried to set that cipher list, and now I get the followi
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, January 21, 2005 10:10 PM
Subject: RE: SSL error: no cipher list
> No sure if you have set it or not. If not, you can try following example:
>
> #define CIPHER_LIST "ALL:!ADH:!LOW:!EXP:!MD5:@STRENGTH"
>
> SSL_CTX_set_cipher_list
No sure if you have set it or not. If not, you can try following example:
#define CIPHER_LIST "ALL:!ADH:!LOW:!EXP:!MD5:@STRENGTH"
SSL_CTX_set_cipher_list(ctx, CIPHER_LIST) ;
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Yuriy Synov
Sent: Friday, January 2
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 01:56:12PM -0500, Will Day wrote:
> >I tried to verify my cert using:
> >error 20 at 0 depth lookup:unable to get local issuer certificate
> >
> >What does error 20 mean? The cert works when using https, imaps, pop3s,
> >etc.
unable to get local issuer certificate means th
34 matches
Mail list logo
