RE: [openssl-users] RE: RSA-SHA1 Digest

2007-03-06 Thread WCR
users] RE: RSA-SHA1 Digest Bonjour, Hodie pr. Non. Mar. MMVII est, WCR scripsit: > Your comments have been very helpful. > I've had a look at the SOAP/XMLDSIG documentation and realise, as you > suggested that I must normalize / canonicalize the data between the tags > and bef

Re: [openssl-users] RE: RSA-SHA1 Digest

2007-03-06 Thread Erwann ABALEA
Bonjour, Hodie pr. Non. Mar. MMVII est, WCR scripsit: > Your comments have been very helpful. > I've had a look at the SOAP/XMLDSIG documentation and realise, as you > suggested that I must normalize / canonicalize the data between the tags > and before digesting. > > Do you know of any utiliti

RE: RSA-SHA1 Digest

2007-03-06 Thread WCR
ly up and I'm in trouble. Regards David -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Goetz Babin-Ebell Sent: 05 March 2007 17:47 To: openssl-users@openssl.org Subject: Re: RSA-SHA1 Digest -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello David,

Re: RSA-SHA1 Digest

2007-03-05 Thread Goetz Babin-Ebell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello David, WCR wrote: > I'm beginning to get this now, but I still have a problem :-(( > > How do I obtain this result > sXD2SsGQxI7DDFMwHwONxjGOaoI= > from the data object in the soap envelope? For that you have to study the SOAP / XMLDSIG documen

RE: RSA-SHA1 Digest

2007-03-05 Thread WCR
TECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Julius Davies Sent: 27 February 2007 17:37 To: openssl-users@openssl.org Subject: Re: RSA-SHA1 Digest If you take the data inside here and base64 decode it, you end up with 20 bytes. sXD2SsGQxI7DDFMwHwONxjGOaoI= $ echo 'sXD2SsGQxI7DDFMwHw

Re: RSA-SHA1 Digest

2007-02-27 Thread Goetz Babin-Ebell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello David, WCR wrote: > also Goetz, > >> Doing digest and sign in two steps is very unusual. >> Usually you process the digest and generate the signature >> in one step. > > Unfortunately, I think I do need both the digest and the signature to stu

Re: RSA-SHA1 Digest

2007-02-27 Thread Julius Davies
osts. Thank you both for your patience. David -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Julius Davies Sent: 26 February 2007 22:30 To: openssl-users@openssl.org Subject: Re: RSA-SHA1 Digest I think I finally understand. This isn't 28 bytes: sXD2S

RE: RSA-SHA1 Digest

2007-02-27 Thread WCR
2007 22:30 To: openssl-users@openssl.org Subject: Re: RSA-SHA1 Digest I think I finally understand. This isn't 28 bytes: sXD2SsGQxI7DDFMwHwONxjGOaoI= That's 20 bytes of base64 encoded bytes. So you really are using sha1. yours, Julius On 2/26/07, Goetz Babin-Ebell &

Re: RSA-SHA1 Digest

2007-02-26 Thread Julius Davies
I think I finally understand. This isn't 28 bytes: sXD2SsGQxI7DDFMwHwONxjGOaoI= That's 20 bytes of base64 encoded bytes. So you really are using sha1. yours, Julius On 2/26/07, Goetz Babin-Ebell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello David, WCR

Re: RSA-SHA1 Digest

2007-02-26 Thread Goetz Babin-Ebell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello David, WCR wrote: > Julius > > You're probably pointing me in the right direction. Not really. > I tried "openssl dgst -sha224" and yes I got a 56byte hex string / 28byte > character string. My problem now is I can't use it in my xml message b

RE: RSA-SHA1 Digest

2007-02-26 Thread WCR
ot; the output is 40bytes. Is there another step I need to take to get a valid string? Thank you for your time. David -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Julius Davies Sent: 26 February 2007 13:54 To: openssl-users@openssl.org Subject: Re: RSA-SHA

Re: RSA-SHA1 Digest

2007-02-26 Thread Julius Davies
The 40 bytes you're seeing might actually be 20 bytes: 9699dc843a1608b4 That's 8 bytes, not 16. If all the examples you've seen produce 28 byte digests, they are probably using sha224. $ echo "28 * 8" | bc 224 :-) Try using "openssl dgst -sha224" instead of sha1. yours, Julius On 2/26/

RE: RSA-SHA1 Digest

2007-02-26 Thread WCR
ytes. I must be missing something or perhaps I need a holiday. Any suggestions, even holiday ones, would be appreciated :-) David -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Julius Davies Sent: 25 February 2007 20:56 To: openssl-users@openssl.org

Re: RSA-SHA1 Digest

2007-02-25 Thread Julius Davies
Hi, David, I don't quite understand. Are you trying sign something? If you're trying to sign something, then it looks like this (please excuse my pseudo-code!): byte[] twentyBytes = sha1( input ); byte[] signature = rsaEncrypt( privateKey, twentyBytes ); In other words, you can use RSA to enc