openssl-us...@openssl.org [mailto:owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org]
On Behalf Of Thomson, Duncan
Sent: Friday, September 13, 2013 9:10 PM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: RE: Interoperability question
For reasons I can't go into, it is mandatory that we use Microsoft's
"Cryptography
us. Is that possible?
Duncan
>-Original Message-
>From: owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org [mailto:owner-openssl-
>us...@openssl.org] On Behalf Of mclellan, dave
>Sent: Friday, September 13, 2013 11:48 AM
>To: openssl-users@openssl.org
>Subject: RE: Interoperability question
>
Is there a reason you don't want to use OpenSSL on windows? I'd say that would
be pretty interoperable -- or more appropriately: it would make your source the
same (roughly) for Windows and Linux.
Humbly suggested...
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-
Dave McLellan, VMAX Software Engineering, EMC Corporatio
