Re: Intermediate signing certs

2001-12-11 Thread Bear Giles
> > This doesn't help you when presented a naked cert by a stranger[...] > > Any parseable certificate presented by a strager is good enough to > use that public key to send email encrypted to *his* private key. > At least if there's no chance for man-in-the-middle. Not if the cert denies such

RE: Intermediate signing certs

2001-12-11 Thread Vadim Fedukovich
On Tue, 11 Dec 2001, Tat Sing Kong wrote: > > That's me told then, so to authenticate a certificate you need the whole > "chain" of certs going from the cert to authenticate all the way to a > trusted CA. It's unlikely just authentication is of any practical use; authorization is and risk of f

RE: Intermediate signing certs

2001-12-11 Thread Tat Sing Kong
That's me told then, so to authenticate a certificate you need the whole "chain" of certs going from the cert to authenticate all the way to a trusted CA. The application I am writing is presented with certs to authenicate from an external source, and the configuration has to hold a "pool" of tr

Re: Intermediate signing certs

2001-12-11 Thread Vadim Fedukovich
On Mon, 10 Dec 2001, Bear Giles wrote: > > Would this be a hassle if you have a root CA with a lot of intermediate > > signers? That means that you have to store/locate all possible intermediate > > signers to evaluate a couple of end user certificates. > > This is why PKCS12 (iirc) provides a

Re: Intermediate signing certs

2001-12-10 Thread Bear Giles
> Would this be a hassle if you have a root CA with a lot of intermediate > signers? That means that you have to store/locate all possible intermediate > signers to evaluate a couple of end user certificates. This is why PKCS12 (iirc) provides a mechanism to provide intermediate certs with the f

Re: Intermediate signing certs

2001-12-10 Thread Rich Salz
It's not REQUIRED that all certs in the chain be there, but it will probably be useful -- at least the first time. :) > Would this be a hassle if you have a root CA with a lot of intermediate > signers? That means that you have to store/locate all possible intermediate > signers to evaluate a co

RE: Intermediate signing certs

2001-12-10 Thread Andy Schneider
A, B and C need to be available to the certificate verification process if you wish to check that D was signed by C, which was signed by B, which was signed by A. > -Original Message- > From: Tat Sing Kong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 10 December 2001 17:01 > To: Openssl-Users@Opens