: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: FW: SSL_ERROR_SYSCALL
On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 08:00:16AM -0800, Moffet, Scott wrote:
> err is being set to -1
> SSL_get_error is returning SSL_ERROR_SYSCALL
> errno is 11, EAGAIN
> ERR_get_error is returning 0
In fact, SSL_ERROR_SYSCALL is the "catch
On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 08:00:16AM -0800, Moffet, Scott wrote:
> err is being set to -1
> SSL_get_error is returning SSL_ERROR_SYSCALL
> errno is 11, EAGAIN
> ERR_get_error is returning 0
In fact, SSL_ERROR_SYSCALL is the "catchall" message that is
given when no other condition applies.
> err is
D]
> Subject: Re: FW: SSL_ERROR_SYSCALL
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 05:04:02PM -0800, Moffet, Scott wrote:
> > After reading many of the archived messages, I see a common
> question is the error return. It's -1. So, it's not just a
> closed connection. It
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 05:04:02PM -0800, Moffet, Scott wrote:
> After reading many of the archived messages, I see a common question is the error
>return. It's -1. So, it's not just a closed connection. It's some sort of protocol
>error.
If a SSL_* function returns -1, it leaves a more detai
