Re: Browser's signature function

Shawn Page wrote: > > Why is it not advisable to use openssl/crypto/pkcs7/verify.c ? > Because it uses various internal functions that are tricky to handle and subject to change whereas apps/smime.c uses a simpler high level API. Though admittedly it isn't really documented yet but it will be.

Re: Browser's signature function

Why is it not advisable to use openssl/crypto/pkcs7/verify.c ? Dr S N Henson wrote: > tangquan wrote: > > > > you can verify your signature using openssl/crypto/pkcs7/verify.c . > > according to my experience, Netscape make a standand pkcs7 digital > > signature and encode it in base64 format. >

Re: Browser's signature function

tangquan wrote: > > you can verify your signature using openssl/crypto/pkcs7/verify.c . > according to my experience, Netscape make a standand pkcs7 digital > signature and encode it in base64 format. > You can but that's not advisable. With OpenSSL 0.9.6 you should use the 'smime' application.

Re: Browser's signature function

From: "Erwann ABALEA" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, September 29, 2000 2:46 AM Subject: Re: Browser's signature function > Yes, we use the Netscape signtext method here to provide signed data... > > The result can be verified using OpenSS

Re: Browser's signature function

I met this question too.How to signint something in the IE? please give some enlightment!- Original Message - From: 鄭嘉豐   To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'   Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2000 7:28 AMSubject: Browser's signature fun

RE: Browser's signature function

Title: RE: Browser's signature function Hi, Thanks for your great hint. The URL you pointed out is for key generation. Any information is for signing text? kevin > > > Hi > > you are right, > IE usr ActiveX > > Look at for the source code: &

Re: Browser's signature function

Hi you are right, IE usr ActiveX Look at for the source code: http://www.pseudonym.org/ssl/ssl_msclient_certs.html#ms_html hirntod On Thu, 28 Sep 2000, [Big5] ¾G¹ÅÂ× wrote: > Hi, > > As we know, SSL protocol do not support signature function. > But Netscape does it by signtext javascript fu

Re: Browser's signature function

> ¾G¹ÅÂ× wrote: > > Hi, > > As we know, SSL protocol do not support signature function. > But Netscape does it by signtext javascript function call. > How about IE? Does IE support signature function? > If IE does not, is it possible that writing a Microsoft Crypto API > ActiveX which > access t