--- On Thu, 5/15/08, Chris Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Chris Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: RC4-MD5 cipher suites rep;acement
> To: openssl-users@openssl.org
> Received: Thursday, May 15, 2008, 1:46 PM
> On 5/15/08, PoWah Wong <[EM
On 5/15/08, PoWah Wong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Use TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA (AES256-SHA) to replace
> SSL_RSA_WITH_RC4_128_MD5 (RC4-MD5)
> and TLS_DH_anon_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA (ADH-AES256-SHA) to replace
> SSL_DH_anon_WITH_RC4_128_MD5 (ADH-RC4-MD5), right?
I'm not clear on what
--- On Thu, 5/15/08, Chris Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Chris Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: RC4-MD5 cipher suites rep;acement
> To: openssl-users@openssl.org
> Received: Thursday, May 15, 2008, 11:22 AM
> On 5/15/08, PoWah Wong <[EMAIL PROTEC
On 5/15/08, PoWah Wong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there some cipher suites more secure than SSL_RSA_WITH_RC4_128_MD5
> (RC4-MD5) so that they should replace RC4-MD5?
The AES 256-bit cipher suites are not only more secure then RC4, they
are also much faster. :)
-Chris
___
Is there some cipher suites more secure than SSL_RSA_WITH_RC4_128_MD5 (RC4-MD5)
so that they should replace RC4-MD5?
__
Looking for the perfect gift? Give the gift of Flickr!
http://www.flickr.com/gift/
_
