> It depends upon how secure you need to be and your threat model. Likely,
>128 bytes is more than enough. If security is not critical and you're just
>experimenting, switching to '/dev/urandom' should be fine.
>
>
Yes i have done this..
> If you have control over the systems your
> Hi,
>
> my book tells me to call
>
> RAND_load_file("/dev/random", 1024)
>
> this appears to take much too long. is there anything wrong? how many
> bytes do i need?
It depends upon how secure you need to be and your threat model. Likely,
128 bytes is more than enough. If security is no
On 1/17/06, Felix Dorner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,my book tells me to callRAND_load_file("/dev/random", 1024)this appears to take much too long. is there anything wrong? how manybytes do i need?thanks,felix__
OpenSSL
Project
Hi,
my book tells me to call
RAND_load_file("/dev/random", 1024)
this appears to take much too long. is there anything wrong? how many
bytes do i need?
thanks,
felix
__
OpenSSL Project http://www
