Erwann ABALEA wrote:
> > friendlyName, then look for their public key cert using that friendlyName,
> > then look for a corresponding private key using the friendlyName. If I
> > can't find a private key with that friendlyName, I use the localKeyID from
> > the public key cert to match. If th
On Thu, 25 Jul 2002 17:33:49 +0200 (CEST), Erwann ABALEA wrote:
>
> How is that localKeyID calculated? Is it a hash of the public key? If
> yes, then this sounds an acceptable practice, if you really *need* to
> keep separate PKCS#12 files, which is uncommon.
>
it's a digest of the x509 certif
On Thu, 25 Jul 2002, Chris Jarshant wrote:
[...]
> Also, my app will support multiple keys/certs in a variety of places. For
> example,
> the public key cert for user X is in one PKCS12-format file, and the
> corresponding private key is in a separate PKCS12-format file. Are there
> any offici
Chris Jarshant wrote:
> Erwann ABALEA wrote:
>
> > Probably a limitation of the actual browsers. But you might want to check
> > Mozilla 1.0, which seems to be able to save a bunch of private
> > key/certificate pairs at once. I haven't tested this functionality, but it
> > might be possible th
Erwann ABALEA wrote:
> Probably a limitation of the actual browsers. But you might want to check
> Mozilla 1.0, which seems to be able to save a bunch of private
> key/certificate pairs at once. I haven't tested this functionality, but it
> might be possible that there's only one output file, and
