Re: PKCS#1 key vs PKCS#8...

2013-06-22 Thread mike pilato
Remove On Jun 5, 2013 9:08 AM, "Dr. Stephen Henson" wrote: > On Tue, Jun 04, 2013, sanjaya joshi wrote: > > > Hello, > > I am using strongswan(v_4.5.3) for ipsec, that uses my X509 certificate > > and RSA private key. > > If i use RSA private key(un-encrypted) that is PKCS#8 encoded, then > >

Re: PKCS#1 key vs PKCS#8...

2013-06-05 Thread sanjaya joshi
Hi Steve, Thanks for the reply. Yes it should have been handled, but i am not sure about the strongswan implementation. Anyways, it's mentioned in their release notes that pkcs8 is supported v_4.6.* onwards. I have another question. 1. I use openssl 1.0.0, and i use RSA_generate_key_ex() to c

Re: PKCS#1 key vs PKCS#8...

2013-06-05 Thread Dr. Stephen Henson
On Tue, Jun 04, 2013, sanjaya joshi wrote: > Hello, > I am using strongswan(v_4.5.3) for ipsec, that uses my X509 certificate > and RSA private key. > If i use RSA private key(un-encrypted) that is PKCS#8 encoded, then > strongswan is not able to load the key. But it works, if i use a > traditio

PKCS#1 key vs PKCS#8...

2013-06-04 Thread sanjaya joshi
Hello, I am using strongswan(v_4.5.3) for ipsec, that uses my X509 certificate and RSA private key. If i use RSA private key(un-encrypted) that is PKCS#8 encoded, then strongswan is not able to load the key. But it works, if i use a traditional PKCS#1 encoded RSA key. Could anyone explain, which