On 8/12/21 10:11, Matt Caswell wrote:
>
>
> On 12/08/2021 01:35, Dennis Clarke via openssl-users wrote:
>> On 8/5/21 00:55, Dr Paul Dale wrote:
>>> Dennis,
>>>
>>> Thanks for the information. Solaris and z/OS are not tested by the
>>> project, so it's good to know they aren't too far from workin
On 12/08/2021 01:35, Dennis Clarke via openssl-users wrote:
On 8/5/21 00:55, Dr Paul Dale wrote:
Dennis,
Thanks for the information. Solaris and z/OS are not tested by the
project, so it's good to know they aren't too far from working out of
the box.
We would definitely be interested in a
On 8/5/21 00:55, Dr Paul Dale wrote:
> Dennis,
>
> Thanks for the information. Solaris and z/OS are not tested by the
> project, so it's good to know they aren't too far from working out of
> the box.
>
> We would definitely be interested in a pull request with your fixes at
> some stage -- post
Dennis,
Thanks for the information. Solaris and z/OS are not tested by the
project, so it's good to know they aren't too far from working out of
the box.
We would definitely be interested in a pull request with your fixes at
some stage -- post 3.0 since it's almost certainly too late now.
>From another thread :
>
> The OpenSSL team has wondered how many people were trying out 3.0
> during the beta period without any way of knowing for sure.
>
If your curious about the old legacy Solaris 10 on reasonably new
Fujitsu SPARC64 then I can tell you nearly everything "just works".
