On 06/30/2012 08:55 PM, Paul Suhler wrote:
> I see that the FIPS 2.0 tarball is not available online. Moreover,
> the link to request a CD (http://openssl.com/fips/verify.html)
> doesn't work.
Should be fixed now ... we've only recently recovered from a major and
extended power outage.
-Steve M.
I see that the FIPS 2.0 tarball is not available online. Moreover, the link to
request a CD (http://openssl.com/fips/verify.html) doesn't work.
Thanks,
Paul
_
Paul A. Suhler, PhD | Firmware Eng
On 06/28/2012 01:17 PM, "Magosányi, Árpád" wrote:
> On 06/28/2012 06:42 PM, Keith Bennett wrote:
>> I do wonder if this is the proper time & place to discuss the
>> implications of requiring source code to have been obtained by a
>> "secure path" excluding the internet. Can an internet-enabled open
On 06/28/2012 06:42 PM, Keith Bennett wrote:
> I do wonder if this is the proper time & place to discuss the
> implications of requiring source code to have been obtained by a
> "secure path" excluding the internet. Can an internet-enabled open
> source therefore be considered "secure" by that defi
On 06/28/2012 12:42 PM, Keith Bennett wrote:
> I do wonder if this is the proper time & place to discuss the
> implications of requiring source code to have been obtained by a "secure
> path" excluding the internet. Can an internet-enabled open source
> therefore be considered "secure" by that defi
I do wonder if this is the proper time & place to discuss the implications
of requiring source code to have been obtained by a "secure path" excluding
the internet. Can an internet-enabled open source therefore be considered
"secure" by that definition?
--
Keith Bennett
