On Wed 2019-02-27 16:02:32 +0100, Christian Heimes wrote:
> In my humble opinion, it's problematic and confusing to use "OpenSSL
> 3.0" for the next major version of OpenSSL and first release of
> OpenSSL with SSL 3.0 support.
Sigh. You're right, but i wish you weren't. :)
Part of the problem of
On 27/02/2019 19.53, Michael Richardson wrote:
>
> Christian Heimes wrote:
> > I'm concerned about the version number of the upcoming major release of
> > OpenSSL. "OpenSSL 3.0" just sounds and looks way too close to "SSL 3.0".
> > It took us more than a decade to teach people that SS
Christian Heimes wrote:
> I'm concerned about the version number of the upcoming major release of
> OpenSSL. "OpenSSL 3.0" just sounds and looks way too close to "SSL 3.0".
> It took us more than a decade to teach people that SSL 3.0 is bad and
> should be avoided in favor of TLS.
Hi,
I'm concerned about the version number of the upcoming major release of
OpenSSL. "OpenSSL 3.0" just sounds and looks way too close to "SSL 3.0".
It took us more than a decade to teach people that SSL 3.0 is bad and
should be avoided in favor of TLS. In my humble opinion, it's
problematic and c
