Re: Does OpenSSL 0.9.7 support SHA256 Digest Algorithm

at 0.9.7m. That's what ">7h <=7m" means. > > > Best Regards, > > Aaron > > > > -Original Message- > > From: owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org > > [mailto:owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org] On Behalf Of Dave Thompson > > Sent: We

RE: Does OpenSSL 0.9.7 support SHA256 Digest Algorithm

> From: Wu, Hong-Tao (Aaron, HPSW-R&D-SH) [mailto:hongtao...@hp.com] > Sent: Tuesday, 20 November, 2012 22:05 > To: openssl-users@openssl.org > Cc: dthomp...@prinpay.com > Subject: RE: Does OpenSSL 0.9.7 support SHA256 Digest Algorithm > > Thanks a lot, Dave. >

RE: Does OpenSSL 0.9.7 support SHA256 Digest Algorithm

Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 10:01 AM To: openssl-users@openssl.org Subject: RE: Does OpenSSL 0.9.7 support SHA256 Digest Algorithm > From: owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org On Behalf Of Wu, Hong-Tao > (Aaron, HPSW-R&D-SH) > Sent: Tuesday, 20 November, 2012 10:42 > In our produ

RE: Does OpenSSL 0.9.7 support SHA256 Digest Algorithm

icates based SHA256, and the following > error is thrown: > > ldap_bind: Can't contact LDAP server (-1) >additional info: error:0D0890A1:asn1 encoding > routines:ASN1_verify:unknown message digest algorithm > > My question is: > > 1) Does OpenSSL 0.9.7

Does OpenSSL 0.9.7 support SHA256 Digest Algorithm

:asn1 encoding routines:ASN1_verify:unknown message digest algorithm My question is: 1) Does OpenSSL 0.9.7 support SHA256 Digest Algorithm? 2) If answer is NO for point 1, since which version does OpenSSL support SHA Digest Algorithm? Thanks & Regar

Re: OpenSSL 0.9.7

On 1/6/2011 12:23 PM, Garry S Ditzler wrote: > > Can you tell me if OpenSSL 0.9.7 is still supported? Yes, the answer is no, it is not. __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User S

OpenSSL 0.9.7

Can you tell me if OpenSSL 0.9.7 is still supported?

OpenSSL 0.9.7

Can you tell me if OpenSSL 0.9.7 is still supported?

[openssl.org #1568]: OpenSSL 0.9.7 , Error: Incorrect register `%rbp' used with `l' suffix

Greetings, I use gcc version 4.1.3 , Debian 4.1.2-13. I want to install openssl 0.9.7, i am getting the following Installation error: make[2]: Nothing to be done for `all'. make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/openssl/crypto/lhash' making all in crypto/rand... make[2]

Installation error for openssl 0.9.7

Please, I use gcc version 4.1.3 20070629 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.2-13). I want to install openssl 0.9.7, i am getting the following Installation error: make[2]: Nothing to be done for `all'. make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/openssl/crypto/lhash' making all in c

Re: Diff between OpenSSL 0.9.7 and 0.9.8?

On Sat 07-05-19 10:59, Xiaoyu Ruan wrote: > I just have one quick question: what are the major differences between > 0.9.7 and 0.9.8 tracks? OpenSSL maintains both tracks so there must be > some reason.. Thanks. See , or the NEWS file from any openssl-0.9.8*.

Diff between OpenSSL 0.9.7 and 0.9.8?

Hello Team, I just have one quick question: what are the major differences between 0.9.7 and 0.9.8 tracks? OpenSSL maintains both tracks so there must be some reason.. Thanks. -Xiaoyu

Re: openssl 0.9.7 and above break apache with firefox on solaris

Hi Kyle,I rebuilt with zlib 1.2.3, as I was previously using 1.1.3 - but no change.  I also tried compiling openssl with -no-zlibI also triedSSLCipherSuite SSLv2:-LOW:-EXPORT:RC4+RSAandSSLCipherSuite SSLv3:-LOW:-EXPORT:RC4+RSA with no successCan you make other suggestions as to things I might try?T

Re: openssl 0.9.7 and above break apache with firefox on solaris

Thanks,I did a build with openssl-0.9.8-stable-SNAP-20060209 and the no-zlib option.  I still find the same problem.I'll investigate some of the other suggestions now.Michael  On 2/8/06, Kyle Hamilton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Dr. Henson:May I direct your attention to the thread entitled "RE: [ope

Re: openssl 0.9.7 and above break apache with firefox on solaris

Dr. Henson: May I direct your attention to the thread entitled "RE: [openssl.org #1204]: bad record mac because of wrong SSL_OP_TLS_BLOCK_PADDING_BUG handling" on the openssl-dev list? It appears to be because of a zlib size calculation change. However, the specifics are slightly different betwe

Re: openssl 0.9.7 and above break apache with firefox on solaris

On Wed, Feb 08, 2006, Michael Smith wrote: > > A follow-up to my own post from last week. I've done some more digging - > hopefully this is enough for someone to offer some suggestions. > > I have been trying different versions of openssl with apache on solaris and > sun cc. With versions >= 0

Re: openssl 0.9.7 and above break apache with firefox on solaris

Thanks Kyle,Sorry if I'm being daft here - I have tried to read some of the docs and done a google search - but how do I turn off backward-compatability?Michael On 2/8/06, Kyle Hamilton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: This sounds suspiciously like a bug due to turning on compatibilitywith broken SSL imp

Re: openssl 0.9.7 and above break apache with firefox on solaris

This sounds suspiciously like a bug due to turning on compatibility with broken SSL implementations that was found and quashed about a week ago. If you turn off backward-compatibility (including MSIE broken SSL implementation), does the problem persist? -Kyle H On 2/8/06, Michael Smith <[EMAIL P

openssl 0.9.7 and above break apache with firefox on solaris

Hi there,   A follow-up to my own post from last week.  I've done some more digging - hopefully this is enough for someone to offer some suggestions.   I have been trying different versions of openssl with apache on solaris and sun cc.  With versions >= 0.9.7 (see below exact list of releases teste

Compiling openssl 0.9.7.d with automake autoconf, libtool and aclocal, HOWTO?

Hi, I am trying to compile openssl using automake procedure on linux. How can i do that. If anybody has done it please let me know how to exactly achieve that. Thank You. _ Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download

OpenSSL 0.9.7

Hello all! We are using Indy9 build 10 for communication over SSL, but when was released 0.9.7 users are reporting that is not possible to connect on the first time. When we try to connect first time, then communication is finished with error, seems to be some trouble with dynamic library init

Re: Error in Installing openssl-0.9.7-stable-SNAP-20050822

The problem below appears to be related with my using VC toolkits 2003 and VC 6 and not up-to-date libraries..Resolved by using VC 7 (i.e., VS .net 2003). Just in case any one else needs that info.Pan Pap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Dear All,   I would be greatful if you can point out a fix for th

Error in Installing openssl-0.9.7-stable-SNAP-20050822

Dear All,   I would be greatful if you can point out a fix for the following errors:   I follow the INSTAL.W32 instructions and use "ms\do_ms\" When I do "nmake -f ms\ntdll.mak" I get the following errors:   Two symbols (__ftol2, __aulldvrm) are unresolved - but they are both in functions (_round

RE: openssl-0.9.7 & MSVCR70 compatibility problem

-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dr. Stephen Henson On Wed, Oct 27, 2004, Tõnis wrote: >> I'm trying to use OpenSSL ver 0.9.7 e/d version under Windows XP. I'm >> using MS VC++ .NET 2002 which links libeay32.dll to MSVCR70* runtime. >> I'm

Re: openssl-0.9.7 & MSVCR70 compatibility problem

On Wed, Oct 27, 2004, Tõnis wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to use OpenSSL ver 0.9.7 e/d version under Windows XP. I'm > using MS VC++ .NET 2002 which links libeay32.dll to MSVCR70* runtime. > I'm using /MD (multi-threaded DLL) switch. > > The problem is that libeay32.dll crashes on certain function

openssl-0.9.7 & MSVCR70 compatibility problem

Hi, I'm trying to use OpenSSL ver 0.9.7 e/d version under Windows XP. I'm using MS VC++ .NET 2002 which links libeay32.dll to MSVCR70* runtime. I'm using /MD (multi-threaded DLL) switch. The problem is that libeay32.dll crashes on certain functions, for example with rsa_sign(). Compiling libeay32

Re: Openssl 0.9.7 and Sendmail 8.13.0

On Mon, Jul 19, 2004 at 07:58:07AM -0600, The Doctor wrote: > On Mon, Jul 19, 2004 at 09:25:44AM -0400, George Theall wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 18, 2004 at 08:35:48PM -0600, The Doctor wrote: > > > On Sun, Jul 18, 2004 at 09:02:22PM -0400, George Theall wrote: > > > > On Sun, Jul 18, 2004 at 03:18:48P

Re: Openssl 0.9.7 and Sendmail 8.13.0

On Mon, Jul 19, 2004 at 09:25:44AM -0400, George Theall wrote: > On Sun, Jul 18, 2004 at 08:35:48PM -0600, The Doctor wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 18, 2004 at 09:02:22PM -0400, George Theall wrote: > > > On Sun, Jul 18, 2004 at 03:18:48PM -0600, The Doctor wrote: > > > > On Sun, Jul 18, 2004 at 04:50:49P

Re: Openssl 0.9.7 and Sendmail 8.13.0

On Sun, Jul 18, 2004 at 08:35:48PM -0600, The Doctor wrote: > On Sun, Jul 18, 2004 at 09:02:22PM -0400, George Theall wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 18, 2004 at 03:18:48PM -0600, The Doctor wrote: > > > On Sun, Jul 18, 2004 at 04:50:49PM -0400, George Theall wrote: > > > > > > > > Check whether there's a

Re: Openssl 0.9.7 and Sendmail 8.13.0

On Sun, Jul 18, 2004 at 09:02:22PM -0400, George Theall wrote: > On Sun, Jul 18, 2004 at 03:18:48PM -0600, The Doctor wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 18, 2004 at 04:50:49PM -0400, George Theall wrote: > > > > > > Check whether there's a line such as "srv_features:127.0.0.1 S" in your > > > mail server's ac

Re: Openssl 0.9.7 and Sendmail 8.13.0

On Sun, Jul 18, 2004 at 03:18:48PM -0600, The Doctor wrote: > On Sun, Jul 18, 2004 at 04:50:49PM -0400, George Theall wrote: > > > > Check whether there's a line such as "srv_features:127.0.0.1 S" in your > > mail server's access DB -- that disables STARTTLS when the connecting > > client is 127.0

Re: Openssl 0.9.7 and Sendmail 8.13.0

On Sun, Jul 18, 2004 at 04:50:49PM -0400, George Theall wrote: > On Sun, Jul 18, 2004 at 02:30:13PM -0600, The Doctor wrote: > > > Are there any know issues?? > ... > > doctor.nl2k.ab.ca//usr/source/sendmail-8.13.0$ openssl s_client -starttls smtp > > -connect 127.0.0.1:25 > > CONNECTED(0003)

Re: Openssl 0.9.7 and Sendmail 8.13.0

On Sun, Jul 18, 2004 at 02:30:13PM -0600, The Doctor wrote: > Are there any know issues?? ... > doctor.nl2k.ab.ca//usr/source/sendmail-8.13.0$ openssl s_client -starttls smtp > -connect 127.0.0.1:25 > CONNECTED(0003) > 7464:error:140770FC:SSL routines:SSL23_GET_SERVER_HELLO:unknown > protoco

Openssl 0.9.7 and Sendmail 8.13.0

Are there any know issues?? I got doctor.nl2k.ab.ca//usr/source/sendmail-8.13.0$ openssl s_client -starttls smtp -connect 127.0.0.1:25 CONNECTED(0003) 7464:error:140770FC:SSL routines:SSL23_GET_SERVER_HELLO:unknown protocol:s23_clnt.c:478: What?? -- Member - Liberal International This

Problem with compling openssl 0.9.7.c with the crytlib.o

Hi guys =) I`m a newbee in this mailinglist but i try to do my best. I have a little problem with complinig openssl 0.9.7.c I use Win 2k and i tried to compile it with cygwin... First I made "./configure" and than make... Yesterday I searched the whole day how to solve this problem, but

Re: Memory leaks under Win32, OpenSSL 0.9.7

You might also try ERR_free_strings() if you ever called ERR_load_crypto_strings() and/or SSL_load_error_strings(). That cleared up my memory leaks. Regards, Aram Perez Dr. Stephen Henson wrote: > On Tue, Mar 18, 2003, Dmitry Sokolov wrote: > >> Code: >> ---8<--

Re: Memory leaks under Win32, OpenSSL 0.9.7

On Tue, Mar 18, 2003, Dmitry Sokolov wrote: > Code: > ---8<--- > DSA *d = DSA_new(); > DSA_free( d ); > ---8<--- > > gives leaks: > ---8<--- > Detected memory leaks! > Dumping objects -> > {57} normal

Memory leaks under Win32, OpenSSL 0.9.7

CK_ON); ---8<--- I got: ---8<--- [19:43:41] 2 file=d:\projects\openssl-0.9.7\crypto\lhash\lhash.c, line=121, thread=1796, number=64, address=002F4640 [19:43:41] 1 file=d:\projects\openssl-0.9.7\crypto\lhash\lhash.c, line=11

Re: Use of new option " -crl_check " in openssl 0.9.7?

"Krause, Helga" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hello, > > I also tried your way of crl-checking and failed too although the > issuer names of the cert and the crl were the same. > > But the other way with the option -CApath succeeded. > Here are the steps I was performing: > > - RootCert.pem and

AW: Use of new option " -crl_check " in openssl 0.9.7?

2003 23:21 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: Re: Use of new option " -crl_check " in openssl 0.9.7? **Hello, Thanks for this piece of information ... I am trying to do a similar thing using "openssl verify", but failing. This is what I trie

Re: Use of new option " -crl_check " in openssl 0.9.7?

"Dr. Stephen Henson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Try this: > > openssl x509 -in cli_cert_vega.pem -issuer -noout > openssl crl -in ca_cert/vega_cacert2.pem -issuer -noout > > they should produce the same string. If not then the CRL isn't for that > certificate. If they do match then please send

Re: Use of new option " -crl_check " in openssl 0.9.7?

On Tue, Mar 18, 2003, Naomaru Itoi wrote: > **Hello, > > Thanks for this piece of information ... I am trying to do a similar thing > using "openssl verify", but failing. > > This is what I tried: > - Generate client cert from iPlanet CA. > - Retrieve CA root cert from the CA. > - Verify the c

Re: Use of new option " -crl_check " in openssl 0.9.7?

**Hello, Thanks for this piece of information ... I am trying to do a similar thing using "openssl verify", but failing. This is what I tried: - Generate client cert from iPlanet CA. - Retrieve CA root cert from the CA. - Verify the client cert: "openssl verify -CAfile ca_cert/vega_cacert.pem cl

Re: Use of new option " -crl_check " in openssl 0.9.7?

On Mon, Mar 17, 2003, Krause, Helga wrote: > Hello, > does anybody know how to use the options "crl_check" and "crl_check_all" > with the command > "openssl smime" correctly? Erm yes: I wrote that bit :-) You have to add a CRL to either the file mentioned with the -CAfile option or the director

Use of new option " -crl_check " in openssl 0.9.7?

Hello, does anybody know how to use the options "crl_check" and "crl_check_all"  with the command "openssl smime" correctly? Is it only used within a verification process? Which certificates is it taking for a comparison in a given crl? Access to a crl saved in a file resulted in an e

Openssl-0.9.7 install problem

I am attempting to install the OpenSSL 0.9.7 on a Windows 2000 server. When I try to run the mingw32a.mak file, I get this error. I don't see any clues here as to what file it is looking for or why it can't find it. Could it be a problem with the mingw32 or Perl installation ? \opens

Re: IMPORTANT: please test snapshot openssl-0.9.7-stable-SNAP-20030214.tar.gz

On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 06:08:34PM +0100, Bodo Moeller wrote: > Please test snapshot openssl-0.9.7-stable-SNAP-20030214.tar.gz > (or later), which will be available today around 8 p.m. GMT at > ftp://ftp.openssl.org/snapshot;type=d >. > > We plan to release version 0.9.7a soon

Re: IMPORTANT: please test snapshot openssl-0.9.7-stable-SNAP-20030214.tar.gz

On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 06:08:34PM +0100, Bodo Moeller wrote: > Please test snapshot openssl-0.9.7-stable-SNAP-20030214.tar.gz > (or later), which will be available today around 8 p.m. GMT at > ftp://ftp.openssl.org/snapshot;type=d >. openssl-0.9.7-stable-SNAP-20030216 on current C

Re: Openssl 0.9.7 build error with Borland C++ Builder 6

On Mon, Jan 20, 2003, Jasper Spit wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to build 0.9.7 with BC++ Builder 6, but it fails with the > following error : > > bcc32 -otmp32\x_all.obj -Iinc32 -Itmp32 -DWIN32_LEAN_AND_MEAN -q > -w-aus > -w-par -w-inl -c -tWC -tWM -DOPENSSL_SYSNAME_WIN32 -DL_ENDIAN > -DDS

Openssl 0.9.7 build error with Borland C++ Builder 6

Hi, I'm trying to build 0.9.7 with BC++ Builder 6, but it fails with the following error : bcc32 -otmp32\x_all.obj -Iinc32 -Itmp32 -DWIN32_LEAN_AND_MEAN -q -w-aus -w-par -w-inl -c -tWC -tWM -DOPENSSL_SYSNAME_WIN32 -DL_ENDIAN -DDSO_WIN32 -D_str icmp=stricmp -O2 -ff -fp -DBN_ASM -DMD5_ASM -

Re: openSSL 0.9.7 and COMP_{zlib,rle}

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >In message ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, >15 Jan 2003 10:20:46 +, Andrew Marlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > >apm35> I would like to report a bug in openSSL version 0.9.7. >apm35> I cannot get on-the-fly compression to work using >apm35> SSL_COMP_add_compression_method.

Re: openSSL 0.9.7 and COMP_{zlib,rle}

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 15 Jan 2003 10:20:46 +, Andrew Marlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: apm35> I would like to report a bug in openSSL version 0.9.7. apm35> I cannot get on-the-fly compression to work using apm35> SSL_COMP_add_compression_method. The performance apm35> of the s

openSSL 0.9.7 and COMP_{zlib,rle}

I would like to report a bug in openSSL version 0.9.7. I cannot get on-the-fly compression to work using SSL_COMP_add_compression_method. The performance of the ssltest program is the same with or without the -zlib command line option. My own program behaves in a similar way. I have added trace to

openssl-0.9.7 not building with ncr-scde

Hello, i try building openssl-0.9.7 on an ncr server using ./Configure ncr-scde ( uname -a: cti1dev cti1dev 4.0 3.0 3360,3430-R Pentium(TM)-MCA login info: Welcome to the NCR MP-RAS SVR4 UNIX System UNIX System V Release 4.0 (cti1dev) (pts/0) ) and i get the following linker

Re: memory leaks under openssl-0.9.7 on windows

EVP_cleanup(); > ERR_clear_error(); > ERR_free_strings(); > ERR_remove_state(0); > > CRYPTO_mem_leaks_fp(stderr); > printf("\n"); > > return 0; > } > > Above code looks like it worked fine, I mean it detecte

memory leaks under openssl-0.9.7 on windows

ve_state(0); CRYPTO_mem_leaks_fp(stderr); printf("\n"); return 0; } Above code looks like it worked fine, I mean it detected if I miss any free call. But the same code is giving me following leaks under openssl-0.9.7 and its betas: [12:55:41] 351 file=.\crypto\stack\stack.c, line=124, t

[ANNOUNCE] OpenSSL 0.9.7 released

). Only supports MIT Kerberos for now. o SSL/TLS: allow more precise control of renegotiations and sessions. o SSL/TLS: add callback to retrieve SSL/TLS messages. o SSL/TLS: support AES cipher suites (RFC3268). We consider OpenSSL 0.9.7 to be the best version of OpenSSL ava

RE: Openssl-0.9.7-beta6/wcecompat on Pocket PC 2002 -- problem with time.h

Thanks Atul, I'll incorporate this into the next wcecompat release. Steven -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Atul Prakash Sent: Monday, 23 December 2002 6:41 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Openssl-0.9.7-beta6/wcecompat on Pocket PC

Openssl-0.9.7-beta6/wcecompat on Pocket PC 2002 -- problem with time.h

The "struct tm" structure is defined in wcecompat/include/time.h as well as in "Windows CE Tools\wce300\Pocket Pc 2002\mfc\include\wcealt.h". That gives problems in compiling some openssl programs that use MFC includes as well as wcecompat includes. Perhaps, the wcecompat's time.h should be t

Re: TLS cipher suites in openssl-0.9.7-beta3

On Sun, Dec 22, 2002 at 09:14:59AM -0800, Sunitha Kumar wrote: > Some of the cipher suites don't have text values defined for them, Hence > unable to view them in ssldump. > My client is doing TLS, and in Client Hello: there are some cipher > suites with unknown values. > cipher suites >

TLS cipher suites in openssl-0.9.7-beta3

Some of the cipher suites don't have text values defined for them, Hence unable to view them in ssldump. My client is doing TLS, and in Client Hello: there are some cipher suites with unknown values. cipher suites Unknown value 0x39 Unknown value 0x38 Unknown value 0x35

[ANNOUNCE] OpenSSL 0.9.7 beta 6 released

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- The sixth beta release of OpenSSL 0.9.7 is now available from the OpenSSL FTP site ftp://ftp.openssl.org/source/>. This beta contains just a few fixes since beta 5. This is assumed to be the final beta. The final release of OpenSSL 0.9.7 has b

IMPORTANT: please test snapshot openssl-0.9.7-SNAP-20021213

It will be available tomorrow. The crucial thing to test is that things are still working properly in Windows, especially the DES assembler modules. They been changed to generate PIC code on Unix, and it's important that we get tests on how that affects Windows, if it does. -- Richard Levitte

Digital signature on OpenSSL-0.9.7-beta4 for WinCE

Hi all, OpenSSL-0.9.7-beta4 for WinCE works fine except when I verify the digital signature of my Attribute Certificate with the X.509 public key. I use the following command: ASN1_item_verify(ASN1_ITEM_rptr(ASN1attributeCertificateInfo),     (X509_ALGOR *) ACasn1

RE: OpenSSL 0.9.7-beta4: Windows CE/Pocket PC 2002/x86 compilation problem

egards, Steven -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Atul Prakash Sent: Sunday, 1 December 2002 3:40 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: OpenSSL 0.9.7-beta4: Windows CE/Pocket PC 2002/x86 compilation problem Hi, I am trying to compile OpenSSL

RE: OpenSSL-0.9.7-beta4 for WinCE

: OpenSSL-0.9.7-beta4 for WinCEHi all,I've an application to write/read Attribute Certificates with Visual C++ 6.0 and OpenSSL-0.9.6.I would like to have this application for iPAQ with eMbedded Visual C++ 3.0 and OpenSSL-0.9.7 (for WinCE) but it doesn't work fine.I've crea

OpenSSL 0.9.7-beta4: Windows CE/Pocket PC 2002/x86 compilation problem

Hi, I am trying to compile OpenSSL0.9.7-beta4 for Windows CE, x86 environment, for pocket pc 2002 SDK, but ran into a problem during the link phase. I am hoping someone can help. First, the VC-CE.pl required a change because it appears that the compilation flags must be -Dx86 and -D_X86_ (note th

RE: Beta 4 of OpenSSL 0.9.7

EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Beta 4 of OpenSSL 0.9.7 In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 21 Nov 2002 12:09:56 -0500, "ervin ruci" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: ruci> tried Beta 4 of OpenSSL 0.9.7 and apache/mod_ssl. i can't restart the web ruci&g

RE: Beta 4 of OpenSSL 0.9.7

ovember 21, 2002 4:32 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Beta 4 of OpenSSL 0.9.7 In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 21 Nov 2002 12:09:56 -0500, "ervin ruci" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: ruci> tried Beta 4 of OpenSSL 0.9.7 and apache/mod_ssl. i can&#

Re: Beta 4 of OpenSSL 0.9.7

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 21 Nov 2002 12:09:56 -0500, "ervin ruci" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: ruci> tried Beta 4 of OpenSSL 0.9.7 and apache/mod_ssl. i can't restart the web ruci> server. ruci> ruci> Syntax error on line 53 of /usr/loca

Beta 4 of OpenSSL 0.9.7

tried Beta 4 of OpenSSL 0.9.7 and apache/mod_ssl. i can't restart the web server. Syntax error on line 53 of /usr/local/apache+sharedmm/conf/httpd.conf: Cannot load /usr/local/apache+sharedmm/libexec/libssl.so into server: ld.so.1: /usr/local/apache+sharedmm/bin/httpd: fatal: relocation

Re: [ANNOUNCE] OpenSSL 0.9.7 beta 4 released

On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 02:41:11PM -0500, Leon Finker wrote: > > With 0.9.7 beta 4 cipher list: > openssl ciphers "HIGH:@STRENGTH" > shows ADH-AES256-SHA as first one > > Is ADH normal for HIGH ciphers and sorted by strength? Yes. ADH is part of the cipher list as long as not disabled via !ADH (

Re: [ANNOUNCE] OpenSSL 0.9.7 beta 4 released

ber 19, 2002 5:12 AM Subject: [ANNOUNCE] OpenSSL 0.9.7 beta 4 released > The fourth beta release of OpenSSL 0.9.7 is now available from the > OpenSSL FTP site ftp://ftp.openssl.org/source/>. This beta > contains numerous fixes (among others, security-related ones) since > beta 3

Re: [ANNOUNCE] OpenSSL 0.9.7 beta 4 released

Hi, When trying using sessions I get: "1424:error:140920C5:SSL routines:SSL3_GET_SERVER_HELLO:old session cipher not re turned:.\ssl\s3_clnt.c:705:" I get this with s_server/s_client also when specifying -reconnect. __ OpenSSL Pr

Re: [ANNOUNCE] OpenSSL 0.9.7 beta 4 released

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Tue, 19 Nov 2002 12:46:59 +0100, Götz Babin-Ebell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: babinebell> Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote: babinebell> > The fourth beta release of OpenSSL 0.9.7 is now available from the babinebell> > OpenSSL FTP

Re: [ANNOUNCE] OpenSSL 0.9.7 beta 4 released

Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote: The fourth beta release of OpenSSL 0.9.7 is now available from the OpenSSL FTP site ftp://ftp.openssl.org/source/>. This beta contains numerous fixes (among others, security-related ones) since beta 3, which explains the long time that has pas

Re: [ANNOUNCE] OpenSSL 0.9.7 beta 4 released

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Tue, 19 Nov 2002 11:43:33 +0100, Karl-Michael Werzowa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: mikey> A/UX, really? Are there still people using the old Apple Unix solution? mikey> intersting! Apparently. The port was really easy too, it seems: just a new target, and that's i

Re: [ANNOUNCE] OpenSSL 0.9.7 beta 4 released

Am 2002-11-19 11:12 Uhr schrieb "Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker" unter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > The full set of changes between 0.9.6{x} and 0.9.7 beta 4 include: > ... > o Support for new platforms: Windows CE, Tandem OSS, A/UX, AIX 64-bit ... A/UX, really? Are there still people using the old

Any idea on when OpenSSL 0.9.7 will be released ?

__ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Is OpenSSL 0.9.7-beta3 compatible with 0.9.6.2?

On Sat, Oct 12, 2002, Kumar, Mayank wrote: > Hi Stephen, > > For my OCSP implementation, I've taken the new OCSP components from > 0.9.7-beta3 and have integrated it with 0.9.6.2. Have not tested it but I > anticipate number of problems due to incorrect ASN encoding/decoding, mainly > due to some

RE: Is OpenSSL 0.9.7-beta3 compatible with 0.9.6.2?

Title: RE: Is OpenSSL 0.9.7-beta3 compatible with 0.9.6.2? Hi Stephen, For my OCSP implementation, I've taken the new OCSP components from 0.9.7-beta3 and have integrated it with 0.9.6.2. Have not tested it but I anticipate number of problems due to incorrect ASN encoding/decoding, m

Re: Is OpenSSL 0.9.7-beta3 compatible with 0.9.6.2?

On Sat, Oct 05, 2002, Kumar, Mayank wrote: > Hi, > > I've been using OpenSSL code as part of a very stable module for SSL > purposes. Now I want to include OpenSSL OCSP client library also into my > already stable and tested code. But OCSP in only available in 0.9.7-beta3 > version. > > Can som

Is OpenSSL 0.9.7-beta3 compatible with 0.9.6.2?

Title: Is OpenSSL 0.9.7-beta3 compatible with 0.9.6.2? Hi, I've been using OpenSSL code as part of a very stable module for SSL purposes. Now I want to include OpenSSL OCSP client library also into my already stable and tested code. But OCSP in only available in 0.9.7-beta3 version.

Openssl-0.9.7-beta3 applications are not being built "s_server.exe" etc.

Where are the applications in OpenSSL-0.9.7-beta3 30 Jul 2002?     The applications in the apps directory are not being built. The package compiles and passes all test but it does not build the applications, only the object files are being built.   Marcus

Prblem compiling OpenSSL 0.9.7 beta3

I expierenced the folowing error link /nologo /subsystem:console /machine:I386 /opt:ref /dll /out:out32dl l\ssleay32.dll /def:ms/SSLEAY32.def @C:\DOCUME~1\ADMINI~1\LOCALS~1 \Temp\nmb00320 . Creating library out32dll\ssleay32.lib and object out32dll\ssleay32.exp s3_clnt.obj : error L

Compile trouble with openssl-0.9.7-beta3 and Borland Compiler

I failed to compile openssl-0.9.7-beta3 with Borland's compiler. How can I compile it scuccessfully? Environment: OS: Microsoft Windows98 4.10.1998 (Japanese Edition) Compiler: Borland C++ 5.5 for Win32 Error messages: from here

Re: OpenSSL 0.9.7 beta2

- Original Message - From: "Steven Bade" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 3:36 PM Subject: Re: OpenSSL 0.9.7 beta2 > 0.9.7 no longer has separate engine and non-engine releases. The engine > support is integrated

Re: OpenSSL 0.9.7 beta2

0.9.7 no longer has separate engine and non-engine releases. The engine support is integrated into the single release now... Ken Hoo wrote: > Is there an "engine" for OpenSSL 0.9.7 beta2? Do I just use the 0.9.6d > versi

OpenSSL 0.9.7 beta2

Is there an "engine" for OpenSSL 0.9.7 beta2? Do I just use the 0.9.6d version of the engine? __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List

Re: openssl-0.9.7-beta2 doesn't install

Many Thanks to All Regards # Averroes __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager

Re: Fwd: openssl-0.9.7-beta1 testing

On Wed, Jun 19, 2002 at 01:25:15PM -0500, Steve Romero wrote: > I see that this never went out. > >+ openssl-0.9.7-beta1 > > > >When compiling openssl I get: > > > >evp_test.c: In function `main': > >evp_test.o(.text+0x11bc): undefined reference to `

Fwd: openssl-0.9.7-beta1 testing

I see that this never went out. Regards, Steve Romero >Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2002 14:57:28 -0500 >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >From: Steve Romero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: openssl-0.9.7-beta1 testing >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Hi all, > >Didn't see a bug list,

Re: [ANNOUNCE] OpenSSL 0.9.7 beta 2 released

On Sun, Jun 16, 2002 at 01:55:48PM +0200, Lutz Jaenicke wrote: > The second beta release of OpenSSL 0.9.7 is now available from the > OpenSSL FTP site ftp://ftp.openssl.org/source/>. Quite a lot > of code changed between the 0.9.6 release and the 0.9.7 release, so > a series

[ANNOUNCE] OpenSSL 0.9.7 beta 2 released

The second beta release of OpenSSL 0.9.7 is now available from the OpenSSL FTP site ftp://ftp.openssl.org/source/>. Quite a lot of code changed between the 0.9.6 release and the 0.9.7 release, so a series of 3 or 4 beta releases is planned before the final release. To make sure that it will w

Re: openssl-0.9.7-beta1 testing

On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 02:57:28PM -0500, Steve Romero wrote: > Didn't see a bug list, but wanted to let everyone know that I had problems > with this beta release under the following conditions: > > + gcc > + Solaris 8 (patched) > + rsaref-2.0 > + openssl-0.9.7

openssl-0.9.7-beta1 testing

Hi all, Didn't see a bug list, but wanted to let everyone know that I had problems with this beta release under the following conditions: + gcc + Solaris 8 (patched) + rsaref-2.0 + openssl-0.9.7-beta1 When compiling openssl I get: evp_test.c: In function `main': evp_test.c:36

Re: openssl-0.9.7-beta1 testing

On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 02:57:28PM -0500, Steve Romero wrote: > Hi all, > > Didn't see a bug list, but wanted to let everyone know that I had problems > with this beta release under the following conditions: > > + gcc > + Solaris 8 (patched) > + rsaref-2.0 >

[ANNOUNCE] OpenSSL 0.9.7 beta 1 released

On Sun, Jun 02, 2002, Lutz Jaenicke wrote: > The first beta release of OpenSSL 0.9.7 is now available from the > OpenSSL FTP site ftp://ftp.openssl.org/source/>. Quite a lot > of code changed between the 0.9.6 release and the 0.9.7 release, so > a series of 3 or 4 beta releases is

openssl-0.9.7-stable-SNAP-20020509.tar.gz

Hi, I'm not sure if this is the best thread to explain this. openssl-0.9.7-stable-SNAP-20020509.tar.gz show errors when you compile under windows . The error is about a variable "d" and a function "closedir" are undefined. The error is in file ssl_cert.c line 828. My s

R: About OpenSSL 0.9.7 release

I have compile my company utility with OpenSSl 0.9.6c libs. None errors. Then I have recompile with OpenSSL 0.9.7 snap libs and I've got these errors: 'RIPEMD160_DIGEST_LENGTH' : undeclared identifier 'RIPEMD160' undefined; assuming extern returning int 'PKCS7_con

  1   2   >