Hi Steve:
On 2010-11-23, at 6:20 PM, Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
>
> Well you can nest tags like that but that's not the correct encoding for that
> module.
>
> The inner tag uses IMPLICIT tagging so you need IMPLICIT:1 for the second one.
>
Yes - sorry - my mistake.
>
> Well if you used SEQUE
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010, Patrick Patterson wrote:
> Hi Steve:
>
> >
> > You have the outer explicitly tagged issuerLogo field but you haven't tagged
> > the choice option logotype_indirect which needs an implicit tag (taken from
> > RFC3709 definition).
> >
>
> Ok - what would the syntax of that
Hi Steve:
Please see reply inline.
On 2010-11-23, at 2:41 PM, Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 22, 2010, Patrick Patterson wrote:
>>
>> I believe that an indirect issuerLogo SHOULD be encoded in openssl.cnf as:
>>
>> [extra_extensions]
>> 1.3.6.1.5.5.7.1.12 = ASN1:SEQUENCE:
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010, Patrick Patterson wrote:
> Hi All:
>
> Here is a question for the ASN1 encoding gods :)
>
> Given:
>
> LogotypeExtn ::= SEQUENCE {
>communityLogos [0] EXPLICIT SEQUENCE OF LogotypeInfo OPTIONAL,
>issuerLogo [1] EXPLICIT LogotypeInfo OPTIONAL,
>subjectLogo
Hi All:
Here is a question for the ASN1 encoding gods :)
Given:
LogotypeExtn ::= SEQUENCE {
communityLogos [0] EXPLICIT SEQUENCE OF LogotypeInfo OPTIONAL,
issuerLogo [1] EXPLICIT LogotypeInfo OPTIONAL,
subjectLogo [2] EXPLICIT LogotypeInfo OPTIONAL,
otherLogos [3] EXPL