David Schwartz wrote:
> 1) IPsec already has the negotiation features that you would need.
>
> 2) IPsec acts below the TCP/UDP layer. Using SSL would make it very hard to
> precisely replicate TCP/UDP semantics leading to lots of subtle bugs and
> compatability problems
>
>
On Thu, 11 Oct 2001 14:57:14 +0100, Andy Schneider wrote:
>> > The idea would be that if two such machines had SSL
>> implemented in their
>> > kernel and both administrators had appropriately configured
>> them, all
>> > communications between those two hosts could be encrypted
>> transpare
On Wed, 10 Oct 2001 22:53:58 +0200 (MET DST), Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
wrote:
>I haven't heard of OpenSSL being integrated into the kernel.
>
>I wonder, what would the purpose be?
The idea would be that if two such machines had SSL implemented in their
kernel and both administrat
From: "Tom Tang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ttang>I was wondering if anyone has ever tried to port OpenSSL or portions
ttang> of it into the kernel (*nix). I posed this question on the dev mailing
ttang> list but got no response. Thanks.
I haven't heard of OpenSSL being integrated into the kernel
Hello,
I was wondering if anyone has ever tried to port OpenSSL or portions
of it into the kernel (*nix). I posed this question on the dev mailing list
but got no response. Thanks.
- Tom
Tom Tang
ClickArray Networks
Ph : (408) 284-4261
"All that we see or seem is but a dream withi
