On Thu October 9 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Mike:
> If its inappropriate to reply directly, I apologize!
> But I couldn't resist inquiring if you really think some things
> have changed since 2005? Just because the entire banking system
> has failed is no reason to think linux would change :
Mike:
If its inappropriate to reply directly, I apologize!
But I couldn't resist inquiring if you really think some things
have changed since 2005? Just because the entire banking system
has failed is no reason to think linux would change :-)
Truthfully that kernel and distribution has done every
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am having trouble installing the current openssl on an older
slackware 10.2 linux distribution. As indicated below it came
with a /lib/libcrypt-2.3.5.so dated 2005-09-10
I downloaded and tried to install openssl-0.9.8i.tar.gz
As indicated by the directory listings bel
On Thu October 9 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am having trouble installing the current openssl on an older
> slackware 10.2 linux distribution. As indicated below it came
> with a /lib/libcrypt-2.3.5.so dated 2005-09-10
> I downloaded and tried to install openssl-0.9.8i.tar.gz
> As indicate
I am having trouble installing the current openssl on an older
slackware 10.2 linux distribution. As indicated below it came
with a /lib/libcrypt-2.3.5.so dated 2005-09-10
I downloaded and tried to install openssl-0.9.8i.tar.gz
As indicated by the directory listings below only part of it seems
to
