On 30/04/2014 4:23 AM, Blibbet wrote:
> The TianoCore.org project maintains a patch of OpenSSL (0.9x, not 1.x).
> https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/blob/master/CryptoPkg/Library/OpensslLib/Patch-HOWTO.txt
>
>
> BTW, it's a shame that OpenSSL doesn't integrate that patch, and have
> some UEFI-target
> The involvement of Microsoft, makes this initiative highly suspect, and
> I wish the Linux Foundation had told them to get lost. Ever since its
> foundation, Microsoft has used every underhanded trick in the book to
> sabotage open source projects (just remember Bill Gates open letter
> on the
On 4/25/2014 9:33 PM, Awi wrote:
As a US based organization, Apache is unsuited and (given fairly recent
public news) untrusted to have any power of a project such as OpenSSL.
Additionally, the Apache foundation has accumulated so many important
projects over the last few years that it they are
As a US based organization, Apache is unsuited and (given fairly recent
public news) untrusted to have any power of a project such as OpenSSL.
Additionally, the Apache foundation has accumulated so many important
projects over the last few years that it they are becoming a single
point of failur
As a US based organization, Apache is unsuited and (given fairly recent
public news) untrusted to have any power of a project such as OpenSSL.
Additionally, the Apache foundation has accumulated so many important
projects over the last few years that it they are becoming a single
point of failur
I've been thinking that the OpenSSL Foundation really needs to do better
than simply being open to individual funders. A lot of companies use the
libraries, and asking for some proper do-re-mi is completely kosher.
More on this later, I'm in Florida this weekend (feel sorry for me).
- M
On Fri
On 4/25/2014 3:36 PM, Salz, Rich wrote:
While we’re still waiting to hear from the core team about changes, I
might as well add to the noise and throw this out there.
Perhaps openssl should become an Apache project? Keep the foundation for
financial reasons, but use their infrastructure and such
While we're still waiting to hear from the core team about changes, I might as
well add to the noise and throw this out there.
Perhaps openssl should become an Apache project? Keep the foundation for
financial reasons, but use their infrastructure and such. Or perhaps consider
adopting a large
