OK. Thanks for replying.
On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 18:59 +0200, Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
> The only current example of an external EVP_PKEY_METHOD (in the gost ENGINE)
> implements everything from scratch.
>
> It is perfectly reasonable for another implementation to copy existing methods
> or inter
On Thu, Jul 08, 2010, Jeff Saremi wrote:
> The structure itself is only forward-declared meaning that a programmer
> has no way of getting into the actual evp_pkey_method_st and its fields.
> Now that would be fine if there were a complete set of methods
> EVP_PKEY_meth_* to manipulate the pointer
The structure itself is only forward-declared meaning that a programmer
has no way of getting into the actual evp_pkey_method_st and its fields.
Now that would be fine if there were a complete set of methods
EVP_PKEY_meth_* to manipulate the pointers to EVP_PKEY_METHOD. But alas
there's only a few.
: Thursday, October 04, 2001 1:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: frustration about x509 versions ?
Hello,
I have request the root ca of my national digital sign authority.
It's the german regulatory authority for telecommunication.
I have tried to load this with
openssl x509 -inform DE
Hello,
I have request the root ca of my national digital sign authority.
It's the german regulatory authority for telecommunication.
I have tried to load this with
openssl x509 -inform DER -in 4R-CA_1.crt -noout -text
openssl x509 -inform PEM -in 4R-CA_1.crt -noout -text
openssl x509 -inform N
> Now these are the SAME ciphers as another site I tried that works!
>
> Am I doing something wrong? Is this site just being more strict than
> others about letting me send data to it? What can I do?
>
> The site in question is https://www.multicards.com
>
> If anyone has any idea how to solve
Hi
I dont know much about encryption. I have tried to learn about using open SSL
from examples and documentation
I am stuck. In a word
I am trying to create an SSL connection to a secure webserver. It just
isnt working.
Now, I have got some connections working, but the really important one
j
rouble of looking up apache 1.3.6, and finding
all
: > the compatibility issues of frontpage and ssl, only to be told that he
(my
: > boss) does NOT want to upgrade. which brings me down in a bit of
: > frustration - we have apache 1.2.4 (the version that was distributed
with
: > ou
On 19-May-99 Norman Aronsen wrote:
> I went through all the trouble of looking up apache 1.3.6, and finding all
> the compatibility issues of frontpage and ssl, only to be told that he (my
> boss) does NOT want to upgrade. which brings me down in a bit of
> frustration - we have apach
I went through all the trouble of looking up apache 1.3.6, and finding all
the compatibility issues of frontpage and ssl, only to be told that he (my
boss) does NOT want to upgrade. which brings me down in a bit of
frustration - we have apache 1.2.4 (the version that was distributed with
our bsd
10 matches
Mail list logo
