Re: Error 127 - gcc: Command not found

2004-12-10 Thread Ringaby Anders
> Hello Anders, Hi, Servie. > I am just puzzled if doing rpm -Uvh *.rpm is not > allowed at all by FC3? AFAIK, with Red Hat distros > 7.3, 8.0 or 9.0 I could install all the rpm all > together. Not very sure, if this is a new security > feature by FC3? Not very sure myself. I have'nt tried

Re: Error 127 - gcc: Command not found

2004-12-09 Thread Servie Platon
Hello Anders, Thanks for the help and info. You have helped me solve my problem. --- Ringaby Anders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello Servie. > > Have you checked that the directory, where gcc is > located, > is in your PATH environment variable? > > You can check by doing either of this: >

Re: Error 127 - gcc: Command not found

2004-12-06 Thread Servie Platon
Hi Mr. Ringaby, Thank you for the reply. --- Ringaby Anders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello Servie. > > Have you checked that the directory, where gcc is > located, > is in your PATH environment variable? > > You can check by doing either of this: > > echo $PATH > or: > type gcc > > In or

Re: Error 127 - gcc: Command not found

2004-12-06 Thread Ringaby Anders
Hello Servie. Have you checked that the directory, where gcc is located, is in your PATH environment variable? You can check by doing either of this: echo $PATH or: type gcc In order to add the directory where gcc is located, before running make, do this: PATH=$PATH: export PATH Then run ma

Error 127 - gcc: Command not found

2004-12-04 Thread Servie Platon
Hi openssl gurus and experts, I am new to this list and openssl in general and I apologize for asking a simple question. I was trying to compile openssl from source - openssl-0.0.7e.tar.gz which I have downloaded from the openssl site. Things were going on smoothly after I issued the command # m