Re: DES-only OpenSSL version: technical aspects

2008-08-20 Thread Ger Hobbelt
Fred, You're welcome. Best of luck with your Canadian government, er, friends. ;-) Ger BTW: nitpicking my own text there: it was restricted to 56 bits tops back then. Irrelevant though. On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 2:53 PM, Fred Picher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- On Fri, 8/15/08, Ger Hobbelt <

Re: DES-only OpenSSL version: technical aspects

2008-08-19 Thread Fred Picher
--- On Fri, 8/15/08, Ger Hobbelt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ahh... This brings back memories... I had to do the same > 'selective compilation' back before 2000 when the USA would > prohibit cipher export at 128 bit and beyond unless you had a > specific license. Ger, Many thanks for taking

RE: DES-only OpenSSL version

2008-08-18 Thread Bill Colvin
PM To: openssl-users@openssl.org Subject: Re: DES-only OpenSSL version --- On Fri, 8/15/08, Kyle Hamilton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Thanks for your comments. > Well, the question becomes: Which government are you trying to > work around the restrictions of? OpenSSL is open-source.

Re: DES-only OpenSSL version

2008-08-18 Thread Fred Picher
--- On Fri, 8/15/08, Kyle Hamilton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Thanks for your comments. > Well, the question becomes: Which government are you trying to > work around the restrictions of? OpenSSL is open-source. In this very specific case: the Canadian gouvernment. The whole thing does not loo

Re: DES-only OpenSSL version

2008-08-18 Thread Lutz Jaenicke
Kyle Hamilton wrote: > Well, the question becomes: Which government are you trying to work > around the restrictions of? > > OpenSSL is open-source. In the United States, while it may fall under > the export class EI on the CCR, it also falls under export exemption > TSU (see http://www.access.gpo

RE: DES-only OpenSSL version

2008-08-18 Thread Jerry Krinock
-Original Message- >From: Fred Picher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Aug 14, 2008 11:18 AM > Unfortunately this is seemingly the case, as told by actual > gouvernement reps. > Fred, I'm sorry I'm not of any help on the technical side, but I would strongly advise you to heavily discount wh

Re: DES-only OpenSSL version: technical aspects

2008-08-18 Thread Ger Hobbelt
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 5:11 PM, Fred Picher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] >> If this is not sufficient you may check out ssl/sslv3.c etc and >> actually remove the ciphers you don't want to support in your >> libssl from the registration tables. > > As a test, I've commented out every cipher de

Re: DES-only OpenSSL version

2008-08-15 Thread Kyle Hamilton
ers. > > > --- On Wed, 8/13/08, David Schwartz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> From: David Schwartz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Subject: RE: DES-only OpenSSL version >> To: openssl-users@openssl.org >> Received: Wednesday, August 13, 2008, 10:18 PM >

Re: DES-only OpenSSL version

2008-08-15 Thread Leonard F. Elia
red Picher wrote: Hi, Unfortunately this is seemingly the case, as told by actual gouvernement reps. Cheers. --- On Wed, 8/13/08, David Schwartz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: From: David Schwartz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: DES-only OpenSSL version To: openssl-user

Re: DES-only OpenSSL version: technical aspects

2008-08-15 Thread Lutz Jaenicke
Fred Picher wrote: > Hello, > > Thanks for your reply. > > >> If this is not sufficient you may check out ssl/sslv3.c etc and >> actually remove the ciphers you don't want to support in your >> libssl from the registration tables. >> > > As a test, I've commented out every cipher definiti

Re: DES-only OpenSSL version: technical aspects

2008-08-15 Thread Fred Picher
Hello, Thanks for your reply. > If this is not sufficient you may check out ssl/sslv3.c etc and > actually remove the ciphers you don't want to support in your > libssl from the registration tables. As a test, I've commented out every cipher definition in ssl/s3_lib.c, like this example: The

Re: DES-only OpenSSL version: technical aspects

2008-08-14 Thread Lutz Jaenicke
Fred Picher wrote: > Hello all, > > I'd like to get all of the ciphers that are tagged 'export' as > well as the 56-bit ones that are not. Eg.: > > (list somewhat shortened in width) > > EDH-RSA-DES-CBC-SHA SSLv3 Kx=DH Enc=DES(56) > EDH-DSS-DES-CBC-SHA SSLv3 Kx=DH Enc=DES(56)

DES-only OpenSSL version: technical aspects

2008-08-14 Thread Fred Picher
Hello all, I'd like to get all of the ciphers that are tagged 'export' as well as the 56-bit ones that are not. Eg.: (list somewhat shortened in width) EDH-RSA-DES-CBC-SHA SSLv3 Kx=DH Enc=DES(56) EDH-DSS-DES-CBC-SHA SSLv3 Kx=DH Enc=DES(56) DES-CBC-SHA SSLv3 Kx=

RE: DES-only OpenSSL version

2008-08-14 Thread Fred Picher
Hi, Unfortunately this is seemingly the case, as told by actual gouvernement reps. Cheers. --- On Wed, 8/13/08, David Schwartz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: David Schwartz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: DES-only OpenSSL version > To: openssl-users@o

RE: DES-only OpenSSL version

2008-08-13 Thread David Schwartz
Fred Picher: > For export regulations compliance I must dumb down OpenSSL to use > only DES. And that's only DES, no 3DES ! So I got it down to: Are you sure you aren't trying to comply with ancient regulations that no longer apply? It's been years since anyone I know of has had to dumb thei

DES-only OpenSSL version

2008-08-13 Thread Fred Picher
Hello, For export regulations compliance I must dumb down OpenSSL to use only DES. And that's only DES, no 3DES ! So I got it down to: openssl ciphers -v EDH-DSS-DES-CBC3-SHA SSLv3 Kx=DH Au=DSS Enc=3DES(168) Mac=SHA1 EDH-DSS-DES-CBC-SHA SSLv3 Kx=DH Au=D