Re: CryptoSwift 200 PCI Card Errors

ox> interchangeable. Oh, my bad. It's been a long time since I've dealt with this. The CryptoSwift card has a library of its own which is used by the OpenSSL engine. THAT library is correctly called libswift.so, and that's the library that OpenSSL (or more correctly, the cswift

Re: CryptoSwift 200 PCI Card Errors

gt; interchangeable. Oh, my bad. It's been a long time since I've dealt with this. The CryptoSwift card has a library of its own which is used by the OpenSSL engine. THAT library is correctly called libswift.so, and that's the library that OpenSSL (or more correctly, the cswift en

Re: CryptoSwift 200 PCI Card Errors

on't remember the details for the moment, I'm sure someone else can fill in unless I get back to you about it. dvdrom_box> Marek Marcola wrote: Hello, dvdrom_box> > I've been trying to get this card, Rainbow CryptoSwift 200, to work dvdrom_box> > with openssl with

Re: CryptoSwift 200 PCI Card Errors

ill in unless I get back to you about it. dvdrom_box> Marek Marcola wrote: Hello, dvdrom_box> > I've been trying to get this card, Rainbow CryptoSwift 200, to work dvdrom_box> > with openssl without any success. dvdrom_box> > dvdrom_box> > When I do "openss

Re: CryptoSwift 200 PCI Card Errors

uot;shared" builds the libraries like libcswift.so, but "openssl engine" only lists engines when you compile it with "no-shared". Marek Marcola wrote: Hello, > I've been trying to get this card, Rainbow CryptoSwift 200, to work > with openssl without any success

Re: CryptoSwift 200 PCI Card Errors

Hello, > I've been trying to get this card, Rainbow CryptoSwift 200, to work > with openssl without any success. > > When I do "openssl speed -engine cswift" I get: > > DSO support routines:DLFCN_LOAD:could not load the shared > library:dso_dlfcn.c:100:filena

Re: CryptoSwift 200 PCI Card Errors

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sat, 25 Aug 2007 13:38:00 -0700 (PDT), Jeff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: dvdrom_box> Hello, dvdrom_box> dvdrom_box> I've been trying to get this card, Rainbow CryptoSwift dvdrom_box> 200, to work with openssl without any success. dvdro

CryptoSwift 200 PCI Card Errors

Hello, I've been trying to get this card, Rainbow CryptoSwift 200, to work with openssl without any success. When I do "openssl speed -engine cswift" I get: DSO support routines:DLFCN_LOAD:could not load the shared library:dso_dlfcn.c:100:filename(libswift.so): libswift.so: can

Support for CryptoSwift PCI cards

Title: Support for CryptoSwift PCI cards I was told that the CryptoSwift card from SafeNet is no longer being marketed and has been replaced with something called Luna PCI.  Does OpenSSL 0.9.7d support this card?  And if so, do you use the same engine string as used for the CryptoSwift card

CryptoSwift - slightly OT

Hello, I have a CryptoSwift PCI card that I am attempting to use under windows 2000 advanced server with OpenSSL. I am unable to get the drivers for the card. I contacted rainbow and was redirected to sales. The sales hasn't returned phone calls in over 2 weeks. Any help or suggestions wou

Re: Rainbow Cryptoswift Support

On 22 Jan 2003, at 20:42, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 22 Jan 2003 >13:12:03 -0600, Scott Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > scottj> Does anyone here use the Rainbow Cryptoswift PCI card? > > I do, occasion

Re: Rainbow Cryptoswift Support

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 22 Jan 2003 13:12:03 -0600, Scott Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: scottj> Does anyone here use the Rainbow Cryptoswift PCI card? I do, occasionally. scottj> What is the extent of OpenSSL's support for this card? Supported alg

Rainbow Cryptoswift Support

Hello all, Does anyone here use the Rainbow Cryptoswift PCI card? What is the extent of OpenSSL's support for this card? Does OpenSSL require kernel-level support for this card to work? Thanks, Scott Johnson __ Op

Re: Problem with cryptoswift card

Geoff Thorpe wrote: > > The first error line tells you; > > >>5272:error:2606607A:engine routines:CSWIFT_MOD_EXP:size too large or too >>small:hw_cswift.c:391: >> > > The cryptoswift engine implementation doesn't support the use of keys that >

Re: Problem with cryptoswift card

Hi there, > I use openssl-engine-0.9.6.c in conjunction with a cryptoswift card. > To test it, I did a "openssl speed -engine cswift". > First everything seemed to work fine - astonishingly most operations > were performed in exactly 2.99 secs - but then errors occured. &g

Problem with cryptoswift card

Hi, I use openssl-engine-0.9.6.c in conjunction with a cryptoswift card. To test it, I did a "openssl speed -engine cswift". First everything seemed to work fine - astonishingly most operations were performed in exactly 2.99 secs - but then errors occured. I include the relevant lines

openssl-engine+cryptoswift

Hello, I would like if anybody have a patch for cryptosiwft HSM with openssl-engine like "load-private-key" Thanks Bahram BASSIRI OMNICERTIS 3 bis rue cité Bergère 75009 Paris Tél direct + 33 1 44 83 88 25 Tél général + 33 1 44 83 88 10 Fax + 33 1 44 83 88 29

RE: CryptoSwift Engine on HPUX 11

using CryptoSwift with OpenSSL 0.9.6 on HP UX. Lynn Gazis -Original Message- From: Jay W. Reffner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 4:17 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CryptoSwift Engine on HPUX 11 I'm having the following trouble when I try to get op

CryptoSwift Engine on HPUX 11

I'm having the following trouble when I try to get openssl to work with Rainbow's CryptoSwift card on HPUX 11.0. After doing a ./config and a make I try to test it with the following command: # ./openssl speed rsa1024 -engine cswift can't use that engine 4489:error:2506C

RE: Apache_1.3.17, Openssl-engine-0.9.6, mod_ssl-2.8.0-1.3.17 Sol aris 2.7,CryptoSwift accelerator board

There's a known issue with the openssl speed test when running the OpenSSL 0.9.6 engine version with Cryptoswift on Solaris; it will be addressed in a future release. The situation which is causing a routine in the speed test to be interrupted does not occur in Apache, so you should sti

RE: Apache_1.3.17, Openssl-engine-0.9.6, mod_ssl-2.8.0-1.3.17 Sol aris 2.7,CryptoSwift accelerator board

1440 requests. During the test it comes up with an error : # openssl speed rsa1024 -engine cswift engine "cswift" set. Doing 1024 bit private rsa's for 10s: RSA sign failure 17338:error:26067072:engine routines:CSWIFT_MOD_EXP_CRT:request failed:hw_cswift .c:524:CryptoSwift error num

RE: Apache_1.3.17, Openssl-engine-0.9.6, mod_ssl-2.8.0-1.3.17 Solaris 2.7,CryptoSwift accelerator board

ED] for help). Lynn Gazis -Original Message- From: adrien mistretta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2001 5:29 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; De Taeye, Herman Subject: Re: Apache_1.3.17, Openssl-engine-0.9.6, mod_ssl-2.8.0-1.3.17 Solaris 2.7,CryptoSwift accelerator bo

Re: Apache_1.3.17, Openssl-engine-0.9.6, mod_ssl-2.8.0-1.3.17 Solaris 2.7,CryptoSwift accelerator board

> 3. How can I really test that the board is used and not the internal > engine? you can use the csdiag command to see if request are made to the crypto card, but I don't remember the option. Adrien __ OpenSSL Project

Re: Rainbow Cryptoswift cards - information

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Although > I'm seeing that much speed improvement (using the "openssl speed" tests), > I'm also seeing a significant drop in the amount of CPU utilisation. > [..] > Even if it were the case that you would get only 3x improvement on a 1Ghz > P3, you would still have su

RE: Rainbow Cryptoswift cards - information

> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Further to my previous message, I have not only received my Cryptoswift > > card, but I actually have it working. I'm seeing a speed improvement of > > around 20x on a Dual Pentium 166. > > Hmmm ... so we can expect about 3x

Re: Rainbow Cryptoswift cards - information

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Further to my previous message, I have not only received my Cryptoswift > card, but I actually have it working. I'm seeing a speed improvement of > around 20x on a Dual Pentium 166. Hmmm ... so we can expect about 3x on a single P3/1GHz. How muc

Re: Rainbow Cryptoswift cards

well... sort of. the 7 January snapshot, which includes working Broadcom engine support, has CryptoSwift, Compaq Atalla, nCipher CHIL and Nuron listed. I thought there was Hifn support too? So... I guess the list is, approximately, in alphabetical order: Broadcom 5805 Compaq Atalla

Re: Rainbow Cryptoswift cards

David Lang wrote: > > when I was evaluating similar products a couple years ago I found that it > really didn't help to try and worry about spilling the load over to the > main CPU. > > benchmarks from the time were > > pentium 200 linux 19 connections/sec 100% CPU > RS/6000 233 (RISC) 29 conne

RE: Rainbow Cryptoswift cards

001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2001 12:47:02 - > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Rainbow Cryptoswift cards > > > -Original Message- > > From: Louis LeBlanc [mailto:[EMAIL PRO

RE: Rainbow Cryptoswift cards

Have you heard of the nCipher card? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rodney Thayer Sent: Friday, January 19, 2001 9:52 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Rainbow Cryptoswift cards is there somewhere one can get a list of the supported

Re: Rainbow Cryptoswift cards

orted Crypto cards are in the Openssl-engine README.ENGINE There's currently built-in support for the following crypto devices: o CryptoSwift o Compaq Atalla o nCipher CHIL for the cryptoswift the french sales told me 31000FF for the cryptoswift 200 or 9400

RE: Rainbow Cryptoswift cards

> -Original Message- > From: Rodney Thayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 19 January 2001 14:52 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Rainbow Cryptoswift cards > > > is there somewhere one can get a list of the supported engine cards? > I mean, there a

Re: Rainbow Cryptoswift cards

e. I mean a real list of the cards and how you buy them/etc.) At 08:52 AM 1/19/01 -0500, you wrote: >adrien mistretta wrote: > > > > > The cryptoswift card provides 'onboard' acceleration of SSL based > > > processing, but the card itself can only handle so ma

RE: Rainbow Cryptoswift cards

I do not know anything about the Rainbow Cryptoswift card. However, I do know how to set it up with the nCipher card. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 19, 2001 5:51 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL

Re: Rainbow Cryptoswift cards

adrien mistretta wrote: > > > The cryptoswift card provides 'onboard' acceleration of SSL based > > processing, but the card itself can only handle so many transactions per > > second. What happens if your traffic load exceeds the cards ability? > > can yo

Re: Rainbow Cryptoswift cards

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > -Original Message- > > From: Louis LeBlanc [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: 19 January 2001 12:39 > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: Rainbow Cryptoswift cards > > > > > > One quick quest

Rainbow Cryptoswift cards

I'm getting a Rainbow Cryptoswift card in the post today (thank you Santa, although you are a bit late). Does anyone have experience of setting this up with mod-ssl? If so, can you let me know how I do it. I understand I need to use shm rather than dbm, but how do I get openssl to recognis

RE: engine-beta3 problem in the speed test with cryptoswift

, September 24, 2000 10:31 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: engine-beta3 problem in the speed test with cryptoswift From: Eric Korsia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> EricK> OpenSSL> speed -engine cswift EricK> can't use that engine EricK> 144:err

Re: engine-beta3 problem in the speed test with cryptoswift

From: Eric Korsia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> EricK> OpenSSL> speed -engine cswift EricK> can't use that engine EricK> 144:error:2507006C:DSO support routines:DSO_ctrl:functionality not EricK> supported:.\crypto\dso\dso_lib.c:302: EricK> 144:error:25072064:DSO support routines:DSO_load:control command Er

Re: engine-beta3 problem in the speed test with cryptoswift

From: Eric Korsia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> EricK> I tried to test the new version of Openssl-engine-beta3 on an EricK> NT machine, with a Cryptoswift SSL card. When I test it with EricK> the Test.exe program everything looks OK, then when I lunch the EricK> speed test, I receive

engine-beta3 problem in the speed test with cryptoswift

Hi, I tried to test the new version of Openssl-engine-beta3 on an NT machine, with a Cryptoswift SSL card. When I test it with the Test.exe program everything looks OK, then when I lunch the speed test, I receive an error: OpenSSL> speed -engine cswift can't use that engine 1

Re: CryptoSwift

ROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wednesday, August 09, 2000 6:15 PM Subject: CryptoSwift > >Hi, > >Does anybody know what I need to do to make openssl CryptoSwift-enabled? >Suppose I buy the CrptoSwift PCI card from Rainbow Technology, and want >to

Re: Cryptoswift 100 ?

is: <http://jazz.external.hp.com/src/openssl/> > * I was not aware that rainbow's cryptoswift had a bsafe interface. I was > under the impression that only ncipher's nfast had such a thing. I just got one of the CryptoSwift beasties, and will try this approach

Re: Cryptoswift 100 ?

On Tue, May 23, 2000 at 05:12:24PM -0700, Arun Venkataraman wrote: > AFAIK, it is upto rainbow technologies to provide a patch for OpenSSL 0.95. Wouldn't it be possible to use the BSAFE patches for OpenSSL, and then use CryptoSwift's BSAFE interface? Jim R LockStar _

Re: Cryptoswift 100 ?

I finally got the 0.9.5 patches out of them. Not well designed, I'm afraid. I'll fix what I can and see if they're willing to take diffs. On Tue, 23 May 2000, Arun Venkataraman wrote: > >Does 0.9.5 support the Cryptoswift line of SSL accelerators? Is anyone > >

Re: Cryptoswift 100 ?

>Does 0.9.5 support the Cryptoswift line of SSL accelerators? Is anyone >using one under Solaris 2.6? AFAIK, it is upto rainbow technologies to provide a patch for OpenSSL 0.95. I believe a patch of 0.94 is available but I am not sure about 0.95. Arun. "The online world is a co