On Wed, Apr 22, 2020, 2:56 PM Michael Richardson wrote:
>
> Michael Mueller wrote:
> >> Michael Mueller wrote:
> >> > We've implemented what I gather can be called a CMS on Linux and
> >> Windows
> >> > using openssl evp functions.
> >>
> >> I'm not sure why you say it t
Michael Mueller wrote:
>> Michael Mueller wrote:
>> > We've implemented what I gather can be called a CMS on Linux and
>> Windows
>> > using openssl evp functions.
>>
>> I'm not sure why you say it this way.
>> OpenSSL includes CMS (RFC3369) support, but I think not u
On Tue, Apr 21, 2020, 9:46 PM Michael Richardson wrote:
>
> Michael Mueller wrote:
> > We've implemented what I gather can be called a CMS on Linux and
> Windows
> > using openssl evp functions.
>
> I'm not sure why you say it this way.
> OpenSSL includes CMS (RFC3369) support, but I thi
A few corrections:
OpenSSL included CMS (RFC3369) support since 1.0.0 (see the CHANGES
file), though for a long time, there was an arbitrary disconnect between
functions named CMS and functions named PKCS#7 even though it should
have been a continuum.
The PKCS#7 and CMS standards equally and
Michael Mueller wrote:
> We've implemented what I gather can be called a CMS on Linux and Windows
> using openssl evp functions.
I'm not sure why you say it this way.
OpenSSL includes CMS (RFC3369) support, but I think not until 1.1.0.
Did you implement RFC3369, or something else?
You d
Greetings esteemed openssl users,
We've implemented what I gather can be called a CMS on Linux and Windows
using openssl evp functions.
We need to expand this CMS to other systems, on which we have not been able
to build openssl. These other systems have a vendor supplied security
application. Th
