Re: CFB change

2010-02-28 Thread Tim Hudson
Bruce Stephens wrote: "Dr. Stephen Henson" writes: [...] Didn't realise anyone was using CFB for that. Note - there is now a Debian bug logged too for encfs which appears to be impacted by this change. See http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=571810 I've forwarded your email

Re: CFB change

2010-02-26 Thread Bruce Stephens
"Dr. Stephen Henson" writes: [...] > Didn't realise anyone was using CFB for that. Is that some default or does it > have to be specifically requested? It was explicitly requested, though I'm not sure for any positive reason in this case (more because we'd used that cipher and mode elsewhere, I

Re: CFB change (was Re: OpenSSL version 0.9.8m release)

2010-02-26 Thread Dr. Stephen Henson
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010, Bruce Stephens wrote: > With 0.9.8m I'm getting some failures to read PEM files (and do some > other thnigs, I think) that 0.9.8l is happy with. > > The PEM files are created by BouncyCastle, I think (though I imagine > 0.9.8l could be persuaded to write similarly failing fi

CFB change (was Re: OpenSSL version 0.9.8m release)

2010-02-26 Thread Bruce Stephens
With 0.9.8m I'm getting some failures to read PEM files (and do some other thnigs, I think) that 0.9.8l is happy with. The PEM files are created by BouncyCastle, I think (though I imagine 0.9.8l could be persuaded to write similarly failing files). they begin something like: -BEGIN RSA PRIVA