Re: Browser's signature function

Shawn Page wrote: > > Why is it not advisable to use openssl/crypto/pkcs7/verify.c ? > Because it uses various internal functions that are tricky to handle and subject to change whereas apps/smime.c uses a simpler high level API. Though admittedly it isn't really documented yet but it will be.

Re: Browser's signature function

Why is it not advisable to use openssl/crypto/pkcs7/verify.c ? Dr S N Henson wrote: > tangquan wrote: > > > > you can verify your signature using openssl/crypto/pkcs7/verify.c . > > according to my experience, Netscape make a standand pkcs7 digital > > signature and encode it in base64 format. >

Re: Browser's signature function

tangquan wrote: > > you can verify your signature using openssl/crypto/pkcs7/verify.c . > according to my experience, Netscape make a standand pkcs7 digital > signature and encode it in base64 format. > You can but that's not advisable. With OpenSSL 0.9.6 you should use the 'smime' application.

Re: Browser's signature function

From: "Erwann ABALEA" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, September 29, 2000 2:46 AM Subject: Re: Browser's signature function > Yes, we use the Netscape signtext method here to provide signed data... > > The result can be verified using OpenSS

Re: Browser's signature function

I met this question too.How to signint something in the IE? please give some enlightment!- Original Message - From: 鄭嘉豐   To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'   Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2000 7:28 AMSubject: Browser's signature fun

RE: Browser's signature function

Title: RE: Browser's signature function Hi, Thanks for your great hint. The URL you pointed out is for key generation. Any information is for signing text? kevin > > > Hi > > you are right, > IE usr ActiveX > > Look at for the source code: &

Re: Browser's signature function

Hi you are right, IE usr ActiveX Look at for the source code: http://www.pseudonym.org/ssl/ssl_msclient_certs.html#ms_html hirntod On Thu, 28 Sep 2000, [Big5] ¾G¹ÅÂ× wrote: > Hi, > > As we know, SSL protocol do not support signature function. > But Netscape does it by signtext javascript fu

Re: Browser's signature function

> ¾G¹ÅÂ× wrote: > > Hi, > > As we know, SSL protocol do not support signature function. > But Netscape does it by signtext javascript function call. > How about IE? Does IE support signature function? > If IE does not, is it possible that writing a Microsoft Crypto API > ActiveX which > access t

Browser's signature function

Title: Browser's signature function Hi, As we know, SSL protocol do not support signature function. But Netscape does it by signtext javascript function call. How about IE? Does IE support signature function? If IE does not, is it possible that writing a Microsoft Crypto API ActiveX