Re: Basic question on version number..

2008-08-25 Thread Ger Hobbelt
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 3:57 PM, Kenneth Goldman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If that's the rationale, I eagerly await 1.0. The lack of a stable > API has hurt me far too many times. I encourage the developers > to freeze the existing API. The core OpenSSL developers already stick to that partic

Re: Basic question on version number..

2008-08-24 Thread Goetz Babin-Ebell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Kenneth Goldman wrote: | > The decision in the case of OpenSSL was that 1.x would have a stable API, | > permitting shared libraries to be used interchangeably. OpenSSL does not | > have a stable API yet, officially. | | If that's the rationale, I

RE: Basic question on version number..

2008-08-24 Thread Kenneth Goldman
> The decision in the case of OpenSSL was that 1.x would have a stable API, > permitting shared libraries to be used interchangeably. OpenSSL does not > have a stable API yet, officially. If that's the rationale, I eagerly await 1.0. The lack of a stable API has hurt me far too many times. I enc

Re: Basic question on version number..

2008-08-22 Thread Joe Flowers
> We're thinking of using openssl in our company but wondering about the version number. Rach, OpenSSL is a great product. It is very widely used and adopted throughout the world. If you ripped it off the face of the planet right now, it would be catastrophic because so many people and systems

Re: Basic question on version number..

2008-08-22 Thread A . L . M . Buxey
Hi, > Why the latest version is still 0.9.x, why it hasn't bumped up to 1.x in > last 8 years. Generally 1.x defines a stable version. hmm, I personally would not get hung up on '1.x is stable' - having used dozens of platforms and software versions to run network delivery solutions I can tell y

RE: Basic question on version number..

2008-08-21 Thread David Schwartz
> Hi, > We're thinking of using openssl in our company but wondering > about the version number. > Why the latest version is still 0.9.x, why it hasn't bumped up > to 1.x in last 8 years. Generally 1.x defines a stable version. > Any insight would be helpful in making a decision. > Thanks, > Ra

Basic question on version number..

2008-08-21 Thread R B
Hi, We're thinking of using openssl in our company but wondering about the version number. Why the latest version is still 0.9.x, why it hasn't bumped up to 1.x in last 8 years. Generally 1.x defines a stable version. Any insight would be helpful in making a decision. Thanks, Rach