Hi,
I realise the 1.0.0 to 1.0.1 transition happened some time ago, but it only
hit Centos recently (with the 6.5 release). Some of our code broke, and while
I suspect the problem is too low-level / detailed for anyone to say anything
useful, I thought I better ask, just in case... (if you can h
I should have also said that this is called by X509_REQ_sign.
So, in short, the EVP_MD.digest atrtibute is not used to do signing when
passed to X509_REQ_sign.
You know, it's only writing that the word "digest" has jumped out at me. Is
that even the right place for doing signing? Or is it mean
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013, andrew cooke wrote:
>
> I should have also said that this is called by X509_REQ_sign.
>
> So, in short, the EVP_MD.digest atrtibute is not used to do signing when
> passed to X509_REQ_sign.
>
> You know, it's only writing that the word "digest" has jumped out at me. Is
>
Yes, that's how my more recent engine-based code works. Maybe the best thing
is to merge those two code bases and get rid of this old stuff. Thanks,
Andrew
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 07:56:46PM +0100, Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 17, 2013, andrew cooke wrote:
>
> >
> > I should have
Argh, OK, the attribute is called sign. So it's correct, I just had the wrong
name in my notes. Andrew
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 03:51:04PM -0300, Andrew Cooke wrote:
>
> I should have also said that this is called by X509_REQ_sign.
>
> So, in short, the EVP_MD.digest atrtibute is not used to
