On Fri November 28 2008, Peter Sysko wrote:
>
> Michael S. Zick wrote:
>
> > Two things that occur to me -
> > *) Doesn't Diffie-Hillman already do that? Without the file exchange.
> >
> > *) Have you considered this plan from the viewpoint of a zero-knowledge
> > proof?
> >
> > Mike
> >
>
>
Michael S. Zick wrote:
Two things that occur to me -
*) Doesn't Diffie-Hillman already do that? Without the file exchange.
*) Have you considered this plan from the viewpoint of a zero-knowledge proof?
Mike
thanks for the reference. i had no prior knowledge to Diffie-Hillman.
looked it
On Fri November 28 2008, Peter Sysko wrote:
> Hello.
>
Two things that occur to me -
*) Doesn't Diffie-Hillman already do that? Without the file exchange.
*) Have you considered this plan from the viewpoint of a zero-knowledge proof?
Mike
> I've read over the majority of the information about w
Hello.
I've read over the majority of the information about what the OpenSSL
project is for and is striving to become,
and, being not a hardcore coder, I must say I a little overwhelmed with
some technical details that I won't be addressing
right now, this post is just to introduce an idea, if
