Re: Re: Issue with 1.0.1d with Apache 2.2.23

2013-02-07 Thread James
> Original Message >From: Bruce Cran >To: openssl-users@openssl.org >Cc: "James" >Sent: Thu, Feb 7, 2013, 9:48 AM >Subject: Re: Issue with 1.0.1d with Apache 2.2.23 > >On 07/02/2013 14:36, James wrote: >> >> Just an update, using a SS

Re: Issue with 1.0.1d with Apache 2.2.23

2013-02-07 Thread Bruce Cran
ine with our current cipher suite. This is probably the same bug that has been discussed recently - see "Major OpenSSL 1.0.1d regression from 1.0.1c" on openssl-dev and ticket 2975 "Regression in OpenSSL 1.0.1d x86_64: Corrrupted data stream". From that ticket: "A ser

Re: Re: Issue with 1.0.1d with Apache 2.2.23

2013-02-07 Thread James
> Original Message >From: "James" >To: openssl-users@openssl.org >Cc: openssl-users@openssl.org >Sent: Wed, Feb 6, 2013, 3:51 PM >Subject: Re: Issue with 1.0.1d with Apache 2.2.23 > >> Original Message >>From: "James" >

Re: Issue with 1.0.1d with Apache 2.2.23

2013-02-06 Thread James
> Original Message >From: "James" >To: openssl-users@openssl.org >Sent: Wed, Feb 6, 2013, 2:50 PM >Subject: Issue with 1.0.1d with Apache 2.2.23 > >I recently upgraded our application to OpenSSL 1.0.1d with FIPS compiled in >but disabled, which has alw

Issue with 1.0.1d with Apache 2.2.23

2013-02-06 Thread James
I recently upgraded our application to OpenSSL 1.0.1d with FIPS compiled in but disabled, which has always been the case in the past. Our application runs in a browser using Apache 2.2.23 and mod_ssl which is compiled against OpenSSL. Testing has revealed that HTTP requests work fine, however

1.0.1d

2013-02-05 Thread Jeremy Farrell
Thanks for the new release, and all the ongoing work. How does the release relate to the source under git as viewed through http://git.openssl.org/gitweb/ ? I don't see any mention of 1.0.1d in there, and the latest change in 1_0_1-stable was 13 days ago. Is the web view of the repos