openssl-0.9.7-stable-SNAP-20030722 snapshot successfully passes the tests.
Is it generally safe to use the stable snapshots? I ask since I am not
sure they are as well tested as a release?
Thanks
Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
On Tue, Jul 22, 2003, Edgar Villanueva wrote:
The test below fails o
On Tue, Jul 22, 2003, Edgar Villanueva wrote:
> openssl-0.9.7-stable-SNAP-20030722 snapshot successfully passes the tests.
>
> Is it generally safe to use the stable snapshots? I ask since I am not
> sure they are as well tested as a release?
>
Well stable snapshots normally only include bugfi
openssl-0.9.7-stable-SNAP-20030722 snapshot successfully passes the tests.
Is it generally safe to use the stable snapshots? I ask since I am not
sure they are as well tested as a release?
Thanks
Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
On Tue, Jul 22, 2003, Edgar Villanueva wrote:
The test below fails o
On Tue, Jul 22, 2003, Edgar Villanueva wrote:
> The test below fails on W2k using dlls. Always in the same place with
> the following message from the os.
> The instruction at "0x0028b7cc" refereced memory at "0x911a0e50". The
> memory could not be "read".
>
> The test is successful when using
The test below fails on W2k using dlls. Always in the same place with
the following message from the os.
The instruction at "0x0028b7cc" refereced memory at "0x911a0e50". The
memory could not be "read".
The test is successful when using the static libs.
Let me know if there is any useful inform
