> Sorry for bumping/reposting, but does have anyone experience with
> changing SSL object's socket on the background?
Is the new socket connected to the exact same process, library, and state on
the other side? Then it will probably work (but why)
If you're talking about moving the TLS connect
> On Oct 11, 2016, at 1:56 AM, Ales Stibal wrote:
>
> Sorry for bumping/reposting, but does have anyone experience with changing
> SSL object's socket on the background?
> I would appreciate any feedback.
If it is not documented to work, then you can't rely on it working,
even if it happens to
Sorry for bumping/reposting, but does have anyone experience with
changing SSL object's socket on the background?
I would appreciate any feedback.
Thanks,
Ales
On 7.10.2016 11:05, Ales Stibal wrote:
Hi folks,
I have a small, but important question which affects my project design.
May I chang
Hi folks,
I have a small, but important question which affects my project design.
May I change underlying socket for SSL with SSL_set_fd when socket was
already set and used before?
I believe it should not be problem, since in theory it's just the
transport channel for OpenSSL where to write,
